On Feb 1, 2016, at 12:32 PM, Martin Maechler wrote:
>> Simon Urbanek
>>on Mon, 1 Feb 2016 08:36:56 -0500 writes:
>
>> On Feb 1, 2016, at 4:16 AM, Martin Maechler
>> wrote:
>
> [..]
>
>>> Back to R: I'm not familiar with that part of the code, neither
>>> the conf
> On Feb 1, 2016, at 2:55 AM, Martin Maechler
> wrote:
>
>> Spencer Graves
>>on Sat, 30 Jan 2016 15:34:36 -0600 writes:
>
>> Hello:
>> In plot.ts, las=1 applies to ylab and not axis labels with
>> multiple series. The documented behavior is to have las=1 apply to axis
>> labels
Here is tests/reg-tests-1c.Rout.fail -
http://pastebin.com/raw/3QVDUBwT
About the libm, I don't know which one R uses.
musl has its on libm. http://git.musl-libc.org/cgit/musl/tree/src/math
I think I also have openlibm installed, but I don't think that's used.
Any more information I can give to h
> Alba Pompeo
> on Mon, 1 Feb 2016 15:33:11 -0200 writes:
> Here's what I did.
> svn checkout https://svn.r-project.org/R/trunk/
> cd ./trunk
> aclocal -I m4 && autoconf
> tools/rsync-recommended
> cd ..
> mkdir build
> cd build
> ../trunk/configure
But it looks like R is working. I found the R binary on build/bin/R
I ran it and it works.
Should I be worried about the make check log?
@Isaac Dunham
Can you please test this on your system too?
Maybe R can be packaged soon?
Ciao.
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Alba Pompeo wrote:
> Here's wh
On 01/02/2016 11:46 AM, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
If I recall it correctly, at least on Linux, rgl only needs X11 when
rgl.useNULL(FALSE). Is that correct? If so, I would say dependency
on X11 is optional and therefore you should be able to load the
package even without X11. Or is it that it sti
Here's what I did.
svn checkout https://svn.r-project.org/R/trunk/
cd ./trunk
aclocal -I m4 && autoconf
tools/rsync-recommended
cd ..
mkdir build
cd build
../trunk/configure
make
make check
On make check it gives an error.
Here's the log.
http://pastebin.com/raw/1qfjqQY2
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at
> Simon Urbanek
> on Mon, 1 Feb 2016 08:36:56 -0500 writes:
> On Feb 1, 2016, at 4:16 AM, Martin Maechler
wrote:
[..]
>> Back to R: I'm not familiar with that part of the code, neither
>> the configuration, nor the usage (in R/src/unix/system.c ).
If I recall it correctly, at least on Linux, rgl only needs X11 when
rgl.useNULL(FALSE). Is that correct? If so, I would say dependency
on X11 is optional and therefore you should be able to load the
package even without X11. Or is it that it still requires X11 libs
but not an X11 server?
My $.
On Feb 1, 2016, at 9:56 AM, Alba Pompeo wrote:
> @Simon. Here's what I did.
> I checked out R revision 70059.
> Ran export r_cv_libc_stack_end=no. (otherwise it would give that error
> we talked about before)
No, the whole point was to test this behavior. I see that the fix is in
configure.ac
On Feb 1, 2016, at 9:56 AM, Alba Pompeo wrote:
> @Simon. Here's what I did.
> I checked out R revision 70059.
> Ran export r_cv_libc_stack_end=no. (otherwise it would give that error
> we talked about before)
No, the point was that you use a clean checkout (do NOT build in the sources)
and don
@Simon. Here's what I did.
I checked out R revision 70059.
Ran export r_cv_libc_stack_end=no. (otherwise it would give that error
we talked about before)
Ran ./configure --without-recommended-packages. (otherwise it would
complain of not finding ./src/library/Recommended/MASS_*.tar.gz)
Ran make.
Ra
On Feb 1, 2016, at 4:16 AM, Martin Maechler wrote:
>> Alba Pompeo
>>on Fri, 29 Jan 2016 08:23:26 -0200 writes:
>
>> Here is my log from 'make check' using an Intel i5 64-bit
>> processor - http://pastebin.com/raw/N6SYAuFX Here is
>> Isaac's log from 'make check' using an Intel Atom
> Spencer Graves
> on Sat, 30 Jan 2016 15:34:36 -0600 writes:
> Hello:
> In plot.ts, las=1 applies to ylab and not axis labels with
> multiple series. The documented behavior is to have las=1 apply to axis
> labels and not ylab.
> To see this, please try the fo
On 01/02/2016 4:26 AM, Martin Maechler wrote:
"BH" == Bryan Hanson
on Sun, 31 Jan 2016 09:50:46 -0500 writes:
BH> I think the 2nd option will be more palatable to
BH> inexperienced users, but both do state the important
BH> detail. Bryan
>> On Jan 30, 2016, at 4:11 P
> "BH" == Bryan Hanson
> on Sun, 31 Jan 2016 09:50:46 -0500 writes:
BH> I think the 2nd option will be more palatable to
BH> inexperienced users, but both do state the important
BH> detail. Bryan
>> On Jan 30, 2016, at 4:11 PM, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
>>
>>
> Alba Pompeo
> on Fri, 29 Jan 2016 08:23:26 -0200 writes:
> Here is my log from 'make check' using an Intel i5 64-bit
> processor - http://pastebin.com/raw/N6SYAuFX Here is
> Isaac's log from 'make check' using an Intel Atom 32-bit
> processor - http://pastebin.com/ra
17 matches
Mail list logo
