Re: [Rd] URW Fonts Description in Installation and Administration Manual

On 30 December 2015 at 20:07, Ramon Diaz-Uriarte wrote: | | | | On Wed, 30-12-2015, at 12:44, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > On 30 December 2015 at 05:00, Dario Strbenac wrote: | > | Good day, | > | | > | In section A.2, the manual advises "Linux users will want the urw-fonts package". However

Re: [Rd] URW Fonts Description in Installation and Administration Manual

On Wed, 30-12-2015, at 12:44, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > On 30 December 2015 at 05:00, Dario Strbenac wrote: > | Good day, > | > | In section A.2, the manual advises "Linux users will want the urw-fonts > package". However, this package only seems to be available for RedHat Linux > and Fedor

Re: [Rd] typo in src/library/stats/man/family.Rd: names of 'validmu' and 'valideta' ??

On 29/12/2015 8:45 PM, Ben Bolker wrote: under "Details" (version 2015-11-29 r69717; not quite cutting-edge, but nothing has changed in src/library/stats/man/family.Rd in 5 months [sorry for using the Github mirror, but I prefer the interface ...

Re: [Rd] URW Fonts Description in Installation and Administration Manual

On 30 December 2015 at 05:00, Dario Strbenac wrote: | Good day, | | In section A.2, the manual advises "Linux users will want the urw-fonts package". However, this package only seems to be available for RedHat Linux and Fedora Linux. What about for Debian or Ubuntu ? There is no urw-fonts packa

Re: [Rd] R, AIX 64-bit builds - trying to understand root cause for message: "Error: Line starting 'Package: tools ...' is malformed!"

On 2015-12-29 11:02, Michael Felt wrote: This seems to be a problem that goes back a long time - and I hope someone who understands what tre is suppossed to be doing will look at this. A short history of other people who have reported on this on different versions of AIX. I shall only add tha