Dear Martin,
Thank you for following up.
I appreciate that this is entrenched behaviour and that changing the
documentation may be preferable to changing the code in practice, and
accordingly I filed this as a documentation bug earlier today
(#16493).
But I don't agree that the current behaviour
Dear Jon,
thank you for raising the issue,
> Jon Clayden
> on Tue, 28 Jul 2015 12:14:48 +0100 writes:
> Sorry; minor clarification. The actual test criterion in the example I
> gave is of course abs((0.1-0.102)/0.1) < 0.01, not abs(0.1) < 0.01. In
> any case, this does not match (my
