Re: [Rd] Code tools for identifying which package A functions package B use?

Thanks Kasper, that seems to do it: $ url=https://hedgehog.fhcrc.org/bioconductor/trunk/madman/Rpacks/codetoolsBioC $ svn checkout --username readonly --password readonly $url $ R CMD build codetoolsBioC $ R CMD INSTALL codetoolsBioC $ R > library("codetoolsBioC") > deps <- findExternalDeps("MASS

Re: [Rd] Code tools for identifying which package A functions package B use?

The best thing I have found is codetoolsBioC in the Bioconductor subversion repository. Best, Kasper On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 9:57 PM, Henrik Bengtsson wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to list all package PkgA functions that another package PkgB > use via Depends or Imports (ignoring Suggests for simpl

[Rd] Code tools for identifying which package A functions package B use?

Hi, I'd like to list all package PkgA functions that another package PkgB use via Depends or Imports (ignoring Suggests for simplicity). As long as PkgB uses importFrom("PkgA", ...) it's just a matter of parsing the NAMESPACE file or inspecting asNamespace("PkgB")$.__NAMESPACE__.$imports. Howeve

[Rd] Error "promise already under evaluation ..." with function(x, dim=dim(x))

I've meant to ask the following for several years now. I understand why: > foo <- function(x, dim=dim) { dim } > foo(1) Error in foo(1) : promise already under evaluation: recursive default argument reference or earlier problems? gives an error, but why wouldn't/couldn't the following work? >

[Rd] Changing style for the Sweave vignettes

Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 12:09:47 +0100 From: January Weiner To: r-devel Subject: [Rd] Changing style for the Sweave vignettes As a user, I am always annoyed beyond measure that Sweave vignettes precede the code by a command line prompt. It makes running examples by simple copying of the commands

Re: [Rd] Correction in help(factanal)

Done. Actually, I just dropped the row-vector bit. Doesn't seem necessary and the "column vectors stored as matrix rows" issue is (a) well-known and (b) generic to multivariate methods. > On 14 Nov 2014, at 10:09 , peter dalgaard wrote: > > Right. (Well, I suppose that you could transpose x a

Re: [Rd] Correction in help(factanal)

Right. (Well, I suppose that you could transpose x and Lambda, but then it would have to be x = f Lambda + epsilon and all the dimensions would be wrong.) I'll fix this in R-devel. -pd > On 14 Nov 2014, at 00:13 , John Maindonald wrote: > > <<< > Thus factor analysis is in essence a model fo