This guess solved the issue, thank you! Sven
On 4 September 2014 01:16, Uwe Ligges wrote:
>
>
> On 04.09.2014 01:03, Sven E. Templer wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> can I claim the warning that occurs (at R CMD check --as-cran) when I
>> use 'library(ggplot2)' in executed vignette code as SPURIOUS (as
>>
On 04.09.2014 01:03, Sven E. Templer wrote:
Hi,
can I claim the warning that occurs (at R CMD check --as-cran) when I
use 'library(ggplot2)' in executed vignette code as SPURIOUS (as
mentioned in the CRAN policies at section 'Submission') and (since it
is the only warning/error) get my package
Hi,
can I claim the warning that occurs (at R CMD check --as-cran) when I
use 'library(ggplot2)' in executed vignette code as SPURIOUS (as
mentioned in the CRAN policies at section 'Submission') and (since it
is the only warning/error) get my package submission accepted? Has
anybody experience wit
Gavin,
You were correct. Operator error.
My tests/Examples directory contained both a
‘PerformanceAnalytics-Ex.Rout’ and a
‘PerformanceAnalytics-Ex.Rout.save’
file.
Corrected now, and check shows
* checking examples ... OK
Thanks for the help.
Brian
On 09/03/2014 03:36 PM, Gavin Simp
Brian,
What you are doing is how I have always checked my packages:
1. Run R CMD check pkg_tarball.tar.gz
2. mv pkg.Rcheck/pkg-Ex.Rout pkg_sources/tests/Examples/pkg-Ex.Rout.save
3. Next R CMD check pkg_tarball.tar.gz checks against the new Example output
Are you sure you are getting the newly c
I did not really try it, but perhaps setting _R_CHECK_TIMINGS_=false
in your ~/.Renviron works?
http://cran.rstudio.com/doc/manuals/r-release/R-ints.html#Tools
Regards,
Yihui
--
Yihui Xie
Web: http://yihui.name
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Brian G. Peterson wrote:
> I'm having a very hard t
I'm having a very hard time making R CMD check produce a clean check on
examples because of the timings inserted into examples by R CMD check.
I am getting a difference on every example output caused by timing
information being inserted by 'R CMD check'.
The current 'Writing R Extensions' man
Stefan,
R-devel is the wrong list. Please subscribe to rcpp-devel and ask there.
Short tip: Don't use a dot in the name.
See the 260+ packages depending on Rcpp listed at the bottom of eg
http://cran.rstudio.com/web/packages/Rcpp/index.html -- I essentially see no
dot there.
Regards, Dirk
I have run across a problem with Rcpp and trying to create a package
with a name containing a dot ('.') using Rcpp.package.skeleton. I get
the following error
RcppExports.cpp:10:25: error: expected initializer before '.' token
RcppExport SEXP genetics.haplotype_rcpp_hello_world() {
implying that
Two notes:
1) For version number comparisons, we could just add a small fuzz like
floor(log(x,8)+.Machine$double.eps) and begone with the issue.
2) I did see some other spots where we use log10() to compute field widths for
decimal representation of numbers. It might be good to check whether th
> Prof Brian Ripley
> on Wed, 3 Sep 2014 06:46:47 +0100 writes:
> On 02/09/2014 22:43, Ben Bolker wrote:
>> On 14-09-02 08:48 AM, Martin Maechler wrote:
peter dalgaard
on Tue, 2 Sep 2014 13:43:21 +0200 writes:
>>>
>>> > Impressive. Never cea
11 matches
Mail list logo
