On 09/07/2014 17:17, lejeczek wrote:
I wonder if anyone amongst developers had a chance to try ACML.
Yes, and documented its use in the R manual over many years.
AMD's implementation when R is supposed to use it seems to fail the test
similarly,
Please do read the manual for yourself (see t
Rscript eats up the last argument when reporting the command it runs:
$ Rscript --verbose "/tmp/test.R" one two three
running
'/usr/local/lib/R-devel/lib/R/bin/R --slave --no-restore
--file=/tmp/test.R --args one two'
With the patch below, I get the following:
$ Rscript --verbose "/tmp/test.R"
> hi. if i'm reading correctly, "Writing R Extensions" appears to be
> inconsistent on the question of whether the arguments passed to a
> routine called via .Call() or .External() should considered read-only.
There are two situations to consider.
1) You want to modify the arguments as a conve
I wonder if anyone amongst developers had a chance to try ACML.
AMD's implementation when R is supposed to use it seems to
fail the test similarly,
on a side note, I had R build with ACML and performance-wise
it looked really really promising,
however now
http://r.research.att.com/benchmarks/
You might be interested in the BiocGenerics package from Bioconductor. It
defines a bunch of "base" generics, as well as some that are specific to
Bioc needs. Being Bioc-oriented, it's not really meant to be a base4, but
it comes reasonably close, and it could serve as a jumping off point for a
bas
