On 05/01/2013 07:20 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 13-05-01 4:08 PM, Tim Triche, Jr. wrote:
What harm comes of having the code be cut-and-paste-able?
I do not mean to be contrary but a downside to applying the patch
seems to
be lacking.
Perhaps I am missing something obvious and if so I beg your
On 13-05-01 4:08 PM, Tim Triche, Jr. wrote:
What harm comes of having the code be cut-and-paste-able?
I do not mean to be contrary but a downside to applying the patch seems to
be lacking.
Perhaps I am missing something obvious and if so I beg your pardon for
wasting your time.
I think you are
On 05/01/2013 12:19 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 01/05/2013 1:34 PM, Tim Triche, Jr. wrote:
+1 to having runnable code emitted
It does emit runnable code, which is why Herve's complaint was
nonsense. It doesn't emit code of which every substring is runnable.
Perdon me, but I was not of cour
On May 1, 2013, at 5:33 PM, Simon Urbanek wrote:
>
> On May 1, 2013, at 10:06 AM, Hadley Wickham wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> In what encoding does format.POSIXct return its output? It doesn't
>> seem to be utf-8:
>>
>> Sys.setlocale("LC_ALL", "Japanese_Japan.932")
>>
>> times <- c("1970-01-01
On May 1, 2013, at 10:06 AM, Hadley Wickham wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In what encoding does format.POSIXct return its output? It doesn't
> seem to be utf-8:
>
> Sys.setlocale("LC_ALL", "Japanese_Japan.932")
>
> times <- c("1970-01-01 01:00:00 UTC", "1970-02-02 22:00:00 UTC")
> ampm <- format(as.POS
What harm comes of having the code be cut-and-paste-able?
I do not mean to be contrary but a downside to applying the patch seems to
be lacking.
Perhaps I am missing something obvious and if so I beg your pardon for
wasting your time.
Thanks,
--t
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Duncan Murdoc
+1 for "} else {" . It might seem a detail, but I agree wholeheartedly that
this would make teaching R easier.
Btw, thank you Paul for the link to your coding style document. It was a
nice read.
Cheers
Joris
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 9:19 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 01/05/2013 1:34 PM, Tim Tri
On 01/05/2013 1:34 PM, Tim Triche, Jr. wrote:
+1 to having runnable code emitted
It does emit runnable code, which is why Herve's complaint was
nonsense. It doesn't emit code of which every substring is runnable.
Duncan Murdoch
patch seems to work nicely, hopefully R-core will agree to a
What is the intended difference between objects of class "ts",
which must have an attribute called "tsp", and objects with that
attribute but not that class?
Calling time series oriented functions like time() or window()
on vectors of numbers produce the classless objects with the
tsp attribute.
+1 to having runnable code emitted
patch seems to work nicely, hopefully R-core will agree to apply it to HEAD
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 9:45 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Whoa.
>
> Don't let my valuable suggestion get lost.
>
> I want "} else {". Yihue wants "} else {". And I have not heard anyb
Whoa.
Don't let my valuable suggestion get lost.
I want "} else {". Yihue wants "} else {". And I have not heard anybody
say they prefer the other way, unless you interpret Duncan's comment
"that's nonsense" as a blanket defense of the status quo. But I don't think
he meant that. This is a ma
No intended change. The trace method was not updated when reference
class generators became functions. Should be fixed now in r-devel and
3.0.0 patched (rev 62699).
Thanks for the catch.
John
On 4/29/13 11:30 PM, Kohske Takahashi wrote:
Hi
The final line of the example in ?setRefClass ind
Hi all,
In what encoding does format.POSIXct return its output? It doesn't
seem to be utf-8:
Sys.setlocale("LC_ALL", "Japanese_Japan.932")
times <- c("1970-01-01 01:00:00 UTC", "1970-02-02 22:00:00 UTC")
ampm <- format(as.POSIXct(times), format = "%p")
x <- gsub(">", "*", paste(ampm, collapse =
On May 1, 2013, at 6:01 AM, cgenolin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Since R 3.0.0, the '#' does no longuer works for comments.
> But as noticed above, comments can be introduce by 'anyWord:' or
> 'myComment;' or 'toto:'.
>
> Since '#' can be used to name a field, we can also used '#:' or '###:' (or
> eve
Hi all,
Since R 3.0.0, the '#' does no longuer works for comments.
But as noticed above, comments can be introduce by 'anyWord:' or
'myComment;' or 'toto:'.
Since '#' can be used to name a field, we can also used '#:' or '###:' (or
even '%:' for LaTeX's fans).
So '#:' is a new possible way for a
15 matches
Mail list logo
