Re: [Rd] R/Sweave/cairo/freetype bug fix.

2013-03-30 Thread Hin-Tak Leung
"... was committed to freetype in January and will form the next release (2.4.12)". -- On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 18:54 GMT Simon Urbanek wrote: >On Mar 30, 2013, at 9:24 AM, Hin-Tak Leung wrote: > >> Perhaps that's too much details. There is (will be) a new freetype be

Re: [Rd] R/Sweave/cairo/freetype bug fix.

2013-03-30 Thread Simon Urbanek
On Mar 30, 2013, at 9:24 AM, Hin-Tak Leung wrote: > Perhaps that's too much details. There is (will be) a new freetype because of > cairo's unanticipated usage (which R uses, among other cairo users). Most > people should upgrade or request an upgrade eventually, when they are > comfortable. >

Re: [Rd] R/Sweave/cairo/freetype bug fix.

2013-03-30 Thread Hin-Tak Leung
Perhaps that's too much details. There is (will be) a new freetype because of cairo's unanticipated usage (which R uses, among other cairo users). Most people should upgrade or request an upgrade eventually, when they are comfortable. --- On Sat, 30/3/13, peter dalgaard wrote: > Huh? > > Thi

Re: [Rd] R/Sweave/cairo/freetype bug fix.

2013-03-30 Thread peter dalgaard
Huh? This is utterly incomprehensible without reading the redhat bugzilla, and even after reading, I'm not sure what the issue is. Something with bold Chinese fonts in X11, but maybe also affecting Latin fonts, ? Please explain yourself. -pd On Mar 30, 2013, at 09:25 , Hin-Tak Leung wrote

[Rd] R/Sweave/cairo/freetype bug fix.

2013-03-30 Thread Hin-Tak Leung
The problem was first seen with R/Sweave (#c0) then reproduced directly with cairo (#c10) and was eventually traced to freetype. The 5-part bug fix: 610ee58e07090ead529849b2a454bb6c503b4995 da11e5e7647b668dee46fd0418ea5ecbc33ae3b2 e1a2ac1900f2f16ec48fb4840a6b7965a8373c2b 869fb8c49ddf292d6daf482617