Hi,
Maybe a compromise would be to just issue a warning without
deprecating? That way people who want to do anova(fit1)$P can
still do it. When working interactively, it's certainly convenient
(serious code however should probably stay away from partial matching).
And so you keep the semantic co
This thread is strange for me to read as I've been getting completion of
object names, function arguments names, and whatnot in ESS buffers for as
long as I can have been using it. And I'm only on ESS 12.09.
Perhaps you need to set `ess-use-R-completion` to non-nil. Or check the
value of `completi
> -Original Message-
> From: r-devel-boun...@r-project.org [mailto:r-devel-boun...@r-project.org]
> On Behalf Of Andreas Leha
> Sent: March-21-13 3:33 PM
> To: r-de...@stat.math.ethz.ch
> Subject: Re: [Rd] Depreciating partial matching
>
> Terry Therneau writes:
>
> > On 03/21/2013 10:0
Terry Therneau writes:
> On 03/21/2013 10:00 AM, Simon Urbanek wrote:
I would think that the ability to hit the Tab key to trigger name
>> completion in your R GUI makes partial matching almost useless. The
>> avantage of interactive completion in the GUI is that you immediately
Terry Therneau mayo.edu> writes:
> To summarize: my own interactive mix of emacs/R may be unusual.
> For pure interactive folks completion does most of the work. I
> hadn't tried the newest ESS interactive-within-emacs till today,
> it's slick as well. The number of people howling will be less
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
> On 21/03/2013 12:59 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > After updating to R-3.0 beta r62328, I get the following:
>> >
>> >> install.packages("Biobase", type="source",
>>
On 21/03/2013 12:59 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After updating to R-3.0 beta r62328, I get the following:
>
>> install.packages("Biobase", type="source",
repos="http://george2/BBS/2.12/bioc";)
> Error in do.call(op, list(v_c, v_t[[op]
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After updating to R-3.0 beta r62328, I get the following:
>
>> install.packages("Biobase", type="source",
>> repos="http://george2/BBS/2.12/bioc";)
> Error in do.call(op, list(v_c, v_t[[op]])) :
> could not find function "R (>=2.15
Hi,
After updating to R-3.0 beta r62328, I get the following:
> install.packages("Biobase", type="source",
> repos="http://george2/BBS/2.12/bioc";)
Error in do.call(op, list(v_c, v_t[[op]])) :
could not find function "R (>=2.15.1)"
The problem can be fixed by adding a space after >= in the of
On 03/21/2013 10:00 AM, Simon Urbanek wrote:
I would think that the ability to hit the Tab key to trigger name
>> completion in your R GUI makes partial matching almost useless. The
>> avantage of interactive completion in the GUI is that you immediately
>> see the result of the partial matc
On Mar 21, 2013, at 10:48 AM, Terry Therneau wrote:
> Note: My apolgies for the "Subject" in the original post
>
> On 03/21/2013 08:59 AM, Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote:
>> Le jeudi 21 mars 2013 à 08:51 -0500, Terry Therneau a écrit :
>>> I am not in favor of the change, which is a choice of rigor o
Note: My apolgies for the "Subject" in the original post
On 03/21/2013 08:59 AM, Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote:
Le jeudi 21 mars 2013 à 08:51 -0500, Terry Therneau a écrit :
I am not in favor of the change, which is a choice of rigor over usability.
When I am developing code or functions I agree w
As a follow-up to my previous, let me make a concrete suggestion:
Add this as one of the options
df-partial-match = allowed, warn, fail
Set the default to warn for the current R-dev, and migrate it to fail at a
later date of
your choosing.
I expect that this is very little more work fo
Le jeudi 21 mars 2013 à 08:51 -0500, Terry Therneau a écrit :
> I am not in favor of the change, which is a choice of rigor over usability.
>
> When I am developing code or functions I agree with this, and I view any
> warnings from R
> CMD check about shortened arguments as positive feedback.
>
I am not in favor of the change, which is a choice of rigor over usability.
When I am developing code or functions I agree with this, and I view any
warnings from R
CMD check about shortened arguments as positive feedback.
But 90% of my usage of R is day to day data analysis, interactive, at th
On Mar 21, 2013, at 09:25 , Rainer M Krug wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 20/03/13 17:58, Hadley Wickham wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:26 AM, peter dalgaard wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mar 20, 2013, at 16:59 , William Dunlap wrote:
>>>
Will you be doing the s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20/03/13 17:58, Hadley Wickham wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:26 AM, peter dalgaard wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 20, 2013, at 16:59 , William Dunlap wrote:
>>
>>> Will you be doing the same for attribute names?
>>
>> Not at this point.
>
> It would
17 matches
Mail list logo
