Re: [Rd] Call function only when running via R CMD check?

2012-12-17 Thread Renaud Gaujoux
Hi Henrik (and list), I am interested in a similar feature, and would be happy to see the suggestions you got off-line :) Have you come up with a robust solution, which would work in a variety of situations (in examples, tests, \Sexpr calls, etc..)? Thank you. Bests, Renaud -- Renaud Gaujoux

[Rd] R-devel

2012-12-17 Thread Ayers, Gregory D
I am wondering if the normal scores version of the Wilcoxon rank sums test can be added to "wilcox.test" in the "stats" package. I have writing a crude function for myself but "Wilcox.test" is the go to function in general. Sincerely, Dan Ayers [[alternative HTML version deleted]] _

Re: [Rd] Strange, most probably unjustified, codoc mismatch for S4 method with one argument plus '...' (re-try)

2012-12-17 Thread Martin Morgan
On 12/17/2012 12:57 AM, Ulrich Bodenhofer wrote: On 12/15/2012 06:26 AM, Martin Morgan wrote: In ?setMethod there is this paragraph It is possible to have some differences between the formal arguments to a method supplied to 'setMethod' and those of the generic. Roughly, if the

[Rd] Suggestion: 'method' slot for format.ftable()

2012-12-17 Thread Marius Hofert
Dear R-developers, I would like to suggest a 'method' slot for format.ftable() (see an adjusted 'format.ftable()' below, taken from the source of R-2.15.2). At the moment, format.ftable() contains several empty cells due to the way the row and column labels are printed. This creates problems (= u

Re: [Rd] Strange, most probably unjustified, codoc mismatch for S4 method with one argument plus '...' (re-try)

2012-12-17 Thread Ulrich Bodenhofer
On 12/15/2012 06:26 AM, Martin Morgan wrote: In ?setMethod there is this paragraph It is possible to have some differences between the formal arguments to a method supplied to 'setMethod' and those of the generic. Roughly, if the generic has ... as one of its arguments, then