On 09/17/2012 01:55 PM, peter dalgaard wrote:
> Very hard to find this sort of bug without reproducibility instructions.
I agree, especially if the bug is in readline somewhere.
> But the bug report says that it is a SIGABRT, not SIGSEGV. That's a different
> kettle of fish isn't it?
Yep. It su
On Sep 17, 2012, at 19:30 , Tom Callaway wrote:
> Full details, including all sorts of logs here:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857655
>
> A very quick look doesn't show anything obvious, in fact, it might be a
> readline bug, but readline is remarkably stable and boring these
Full details, including all sorts of logs here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857655
A very quick look doesn't show anything obvious, in fact, it might be a
readline bug, but readline is remarkably stable and boring these days.
~tom
==
Fedora Project
_
