On 12-03-20 4:40 PM, Spencer Graves wrote:
Hello:
Is there a recommended way to inform "R CMD check" that a
function like "as.numeric" is NOT a method for the S3 generic function
"as" for objects of class "numeric"?
I ask, because I'm getting "NOTE" messages for many function
> Well, yes; you can get there more quickly as follows:
>
>> x <- as.name("foo")
>> attr(x,"id") <- 7913
>> x
> foo
> attr(,"id")
> [1] 7913
>> substitute(foo)
> foo
> attr(,"id")
> [1] 7913
>
> I.e. if you ever put an attribute on a symbol, it stays there "forever". The
> fix is probably to forbi
On Mar 20, 2012, at 22:31 , Hadley Wickham wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I can't figure out how to make this problem easily reproducible, but I
> can demonstrate it very simply, so I hoped someone might be able to
> suggest a place to start:
>
>> f <- function(x) substitute(x)
>> f(x)
> x
>> f(mpg)
> mp
Hi all,
I can't figure out how to make this problem easily reproducible, but I
can demonstrate it very simply, so I hoped someone might be able to
suggest a place to start:
> f <- function(x) substitute(x)
> f(x)
x
> f(mpg)
mpg
attr(,"id")
[1] 11
It works as expected in a clean R session:
> f <
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 12:08:12PM -0700, Hervé Pagès wrote:
[...]
> >So the situation is somewhere between: "it is possible" and
> >"R does not support a safe decision if, what is possible, also
> >can be recommended".
> >At the moment R rather deprecates in-place modification by default
> >(the s
Hello:
Is there a recommended way to inform "R CMD check" that a
function like "as.numeric" is NOT a method for the S3 generic function
"as" for objects of class "numeric"?
I ask, because I'm getting "NOTE" messages for many function
names like this (e.g., "density.fd" in the "
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
> This should now be fixed in R-devel, and shortly in the 2.15.0 beta.
Thanks very much.
Dan
>
> Duncan Murdoch
>
>
> On 12-03-20 2:54 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Duncan Murdoch
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 12
This should now be fixed in R-devel, and shortly in the 2.15.0 beta.
Duncan Murdoch
On 12-03-20 2:54 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
On 12-03-20 1:46 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
On 1
Hi Oliver,
On 03/17/2012 08:35 AM, oliver wrote:
Hello,
regarding the copying issue,
I would like to point to the
"Writing R-Extensions" documentation.
There it is mentio9ned, that functions of extensions
that use the .C interface normally do get their arguments
pre-copied...
In section 5.2
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
> On 12-03-20 1:46 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Duncan Murdoch
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 12-03-20 1:25 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
>
On 12-03-20 1:46 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
On 12-03-20 1:25 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
On 12-03-19 10:27 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote:
Hello,
Sorry to repeat myself, but I was wo
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
> On 12-03-20 1:25 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Duncan Murdoch
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 12-03-19 10:27 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote:
Hello,
Sorry to repeat myself, but I was wondering if a
On 12-03-20 1:25 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
On 12-03-19 10:27 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote:
Hello,
Sorry to repeat myself, but I was wondering if anyone had taken a look at
this.
No. Could you put together a simple self contained example?
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
> On 12-03-19 10:27 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Sorry to repeat myself, but I was wondering if anyone had taken a look at
>> this.
>
>
> No. Could you put together a simple self contained example? I don't have
> any BioC pac
On 12-03-19 10:27 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote:
Hello,
Sorry to repeat myself, but I was wondering if anyone had taken a look at this.
No. Could you put together a simple self contained example? I don't
have any BioC packages installed.
Alternatively, you could take a look at the .tex files ge
I suppose everybody who makes a package for the first time thinks "I
can change anything!" and then runs into this same question. Has
anybody written out information on how a package can override
functions in R base in the R 2.14 (mandatory NAMESPACE era)?
Suppose I want to alphabetize variables i
Bug -- will look into it.
luke
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012, R. Michael Weylandt wrote:
I'm not sure if this is a bug or expected behavior, but I don't see
anything in the documentation that explains it, so I thought I'd
mention it:
~ michaelweylandt$ R -q --vanilla
library(compiler)
enableJIT(3)
`+
I'm not sure if this is a bug or expected behavior, but I don't see
anything in the documentation that explains it, so I thought I'd
mention it:
~ michaelweylandt$ R -q --vanilla
library(compiler)
enableJIT(3)
`+` # Throws an error
`+` # Throws a warning
`+` # Prints the primitive as expected
s
18 matches
Mail list logo
