Wrong list. Only the person who maintains that area (documented on
the page above) can change this, and he is aware of it.
It is never correct to report problems about the CRAN website on
R-devel: there is a contact address for the CRAN webmasters
(cran-ad...@r-project.org as I recall).
On
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010, Simon Urbanek wrote:
On Oct 26, 2010, at 9:04 PM, Michael Spiegel wrote:
Hello,
Is it possible to build a 64-bit package on a 32-bit machine on
windows? I can cross-compile for x86, x86_64, and ppc on a 32-bit OS X
machine. And it looks like I could build a 32-bit libra
Hi Michael,
My understanding is that this should work.
According to section "D.4.2 64-bit toolchain" of the "R Installation
and Administration" manual:
The toolchain we use is technically a cross-compiler: the tools run
under 32-bit Windows but produce code to run under 64-bit Windows.
BTW,
Hmm. So our package does not have no src/Makefile.win and only an
empty configure.win. We usually build a binary version with R CMD
INSTALL --build.
R --arch x64 CMD INSTALL --build yields the message "The system cannot
find the path specified."
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 10:41 PM, Simon Urbanek
On Oct 26, 2010, at 9:04 PM, Michael Spiegel wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is it possible to build a 64-bit package on a 32-bit machine on
> windows? I can cross-compile for x86, x86_64, and ppc on a 32-bit OS X
> machine. And it looks like I could build a 32-bit library on a 64-bit
> windows machine. B
Hello,
Is it possible to build a 64-bit package on a 32-bit machine on
windows? I can cross-compile for x86, x86_64, and ppc on a 32-bit OS X
machine. And it looks like I could build a 32-bit library on a 64-bit
windows machine. But it doesn't look possible to build a 64-bit
library on a 32-bit
On the download page for windows builds of R 2.12.0:
http://cran.r-project.org/bin/windows/base/
The link for "r-patched snapshot build" goes to:
http://cran.r-project.org/bin/windows/base/rpatched.html
which has a link for R-2.11.1 patched. I believe that link should go to:
http://cran.r-pr
Hi,
On 10/26/2010 02:01 AM, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
The example works for me (eventually: the site was very slow to respond)
--- nanoftp reads the response in 1024 byte chunks and makes sense of it.
We do provide debugging facilites via, say,
options(internet.info=0, warn=1, warning.length=400
What you've written will certainly generate an infinite recursion. How
could it not?
Specifying an accessor function says to the system "Any reference to
this field should be evaluated by calling this function." But then you
refer to the field in the function itself, which will result in a c
Thank you very much for this Martin.
It works!
There were two gotchas:
1. One has to add 'deparse.level=1' to the setMethod() function
argument list
2. Adding deparse.level=1 increments nargs() ...so the 3 should be 4.
But now it works!
Best wishes
Robin
On 26/10/10 13:49, Martin Morga
On 10/26/2010 03:53 AM, Robin Hankin wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I am trying to write an S4 method for rbind(). I have a class of objects
> called 'mdm', and I want to be able to rbind() them to one another.
>
> I do not want the method for rbind() to coerce anything to an mdm object.
> I want rbind(x1,x
On 23 October 2010 00:52, Jon Clayden wrote:
> On 22 October 2010 18:55, John Chambers wrote:
>
>>> As a suggestion, it would be nice if the accessors() method could be
>>> used to create just "getters" or just "setters" for particular fields,
>>> although I realise this can be worked around by r
Hello.
I am trying to write an S4 method for rbind(). I have a class of objects
called 'mdm', and I want to be able to rbind() them to one another.
I do not want the method for rbind() to coerce anything to an mdm object.
I want rbind(x1,x2,x1,x2) to work as expected [ie rbind() should take any
n
The example works for me (eventually: the site was very slow to
respond) --- nanoftp reads the response in 1024 byte chunks and makes
sense of it.
We do provide debugging facilites via, say,
options(internet.info=0, warn=1, warning.length=4000)
which may help you debug this. Simply fiddling wi
14 matches
Mail list logo
