Hi,
I consider raster graphics highly problematic in statistics.
People get caught up in the idea of creating pretty pictures, rather
than effectively visualising information.
Plus a lot of people (who should know better) needlessly put raster
images inside reports and articles (even books), whic
The help file for "[<-" (and "[[<-" doesn't contain those functions in
it's usage section ( .../src/library/base/man/Extract.Rd ). Although
that file lists "[<-" and "[[<-" as aliases, it doesn't document them in
a formal manner (consequently, the "value" argument is not described in
the "argu
Hi
This is for developers of extension packages that provide extra
*graphics devices* for R.
In the *development* version of R, support has been added to the
graphics engine for sending raster images (bitmaps) to a graphics
device. This consists mainly of two new device functions: dev_Rast
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Morgan wrote:
> Hi Ross --
>
> Ross Boylan writes:
>
>> I have classes A and B, where B contains A. In the implementation of
>> the group generic for B I would like to use the corresponding group
>> generic for A. Is there a way to do th
On 30/11/2009 10:50 AM, cout...@codelutin.com wrote:
Hello,
I do not know if i am facing a bug or a mistake (and if it is a bug i do =
not know in which category I can put it on the bug tracker), so I post=20
my message here.
I am trying to use the Morris function from the sensitivity package
Hello,
I do not know if i am facing a bug or a mistake (and if it is a bug i do =
not know in which category I can put it on the bug tracker), so I post=20
my message here.
I am trying to use the Morris function from the sensitivity package (but =
that is not the problem). I created a (big) ins
On Nov 30, 2009, at 16:07 , Guillaume Yziquel wrote:
Simon Urbanek a écrit :
And it goes then to my other question: How can you pass to eval a
LANGSXP where the CAR is an *anonymous* function, no SYMSXP
involved?
You just pass it as value of the call. I suspect the reason it
doesn't wor
Simon Urbanek a écrit :
And it goes then to my other question: How can you pass to eval a
LANGSXP where the CAR is an *anonymous* function, no SYMSXP involved?
You just pass it as value of the call. I suspect the reason it doesn't
work is in your code, not in the facility (note that the link
On Nov 30, 2009, at 13:14 , Guillaume Yziquel wrote:
Simon Urbanek a écrit :
Because I've been unable to find what exactly applyClosure or eval
requires, when it comes to the structure of the argument LANGSXP.
For example.
LANGSXP is simply a pairlist representing the expression, e.g. to
Guillaume Yziquel wrote:
Laurent Gautier a écrit :
Anonymous R objects, that is without an associated symbol in R, can be
passed to functions (and in that way makes a binding "take hold of R
objects without using symbols").
For example, building R code made of anonymous objects can be achieve
Simon Urbanek a écrit :
Because I've been unable to find what exactly applyClosure or eval
requires, when it comes to the structure of the argument LANGSXP. For
example.
LANGSXP is simply a pairlist representing the expression, e.g. to look
at "a+2" expression:
> .Internal(inspect(quot
On Nov 30, 2009, at 12:08 , Guillaume Yziquel wrote:
Simon Urbanek a écrit :
You're talking about two entirely different things -- bypassing the
API is a very bad idea, but it has nothing to do with your last
paragraph.
It's very good to hear that it's two different things. This has been
Laurent Gautier a écrit :
Anonymous R objects, that is without an associated symbol in R, can be
passed to functions (and in that way makes a binding "take hold of R
objects without using symbols").
For example, building R code made of anonymous objects can be achieved
by making a LANGSXP obj
Simon Urbanek a écrit :
You're talking about two entirely different things -- bypassing the API
is a very bad idea, but it has nothing to do with your last paragraph.
It's very good to hear that it's two different things. This has been
quite unclear to me.
The API gives you access all use
Guillaume Yziquel wrote:
Laurent Gautier a écrit :
It does not have to be a functional language.
To see it in use within a some-language-to-R bridge, you can check the
source in JRI, rpy2.
I can mostly speak for rpy2, and the way it is done there relies on
both R and Python's GC. Creating a an
Laurent Gautier a écrit :
It does not have to be a functional language.
To see it in use within a some-language-to-R bridge, you can check the
source in JRI, rpy2.
I can mostly speak for rpy2, and the way it is done there relies on both
R and Python's GC. Creating a anonymous R object presented
On Nov 28, 2009, at 7:50 PM, Guillaume Yziquel wrote:
FWIW what I think you should be really looking at is
R_PreserveObject/R_ReleaseObject.
OK. Thanks.
I would suggest looking at the many other R embeddings in other
languages that already exist since I don't think you approach is
very viable
Guillaume,
On Nov 29, 2009, at 13:57 , Guillaume Yziquel wrote:
Simon Urbanek a écrit :
On Nov 28, 2009, at 7:50 PM, Guillaume Yziquel wrote:
FWIW what I think you should be really looking at is
R_PreserveObject/R_ReleaseObject.
OK. Thanks.
I would suggest looking at the many other R embe
Hello,
Would it be possible to include the body of the request that is sent to
the internal web server as the "body" argument of the httpd function ?
At the moment, in Rhttpd.c the body is filled as part of the
worker_input_handler, but it does not arrive to the R side (the httpd
function).
Thank you Martin, for putting this together. Cheers, b
On Nov 30, 2009, at 11:10 AM, maech...@stat.math.ethz.ch wrote:
>> Tony Plate
>>on Sun, 22 Nov 2009 10:21:33 -0600 writes:
>
>> maech...@stat.math.ethz.ch wrote:
"PD" == Peter Dalgaard
on Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:54
> Tony Plate
> on Sun, 22 Nov 2009 10:21:33 -0600 writes:
> maech...@stat.math.ethz.ch wrote:
>>> "PD" == Peter Dalgaard
>>> on Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:54:34 +0100 writes:
>>>
>>
PD> m...@celos.net wrote:
>> >> Arrays of POSIXlt dates always retu
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 04:00:12AM +0100, dsim...@gmail.com wrote:
> > a <- c(1:10)
> > b <- c(1:10)
> > cor.test(a, b, method = "spearman", alternative = "greater", exact = TRUE)
>
> Spearman's rank correlation rho
>
> data: a and b
> S = 0, p-value < 2.2e-16
> alternative hypothesis:
Full_Name: David Simcha
Version: 2.10
OS: Windows XP Home
Submission from: (NULL) (173.3.208.5)
> a <- c(1:10)
> b <- c(1:10)
> cor.test(a, b, method = "spearman", alternative = "greater", exact = TRUE)
Spearman's rank correlation rho
data: a and b
S = 0, p-value < 2.2e-16
alternative
> "DM" == Duncan Murdoch
> on Sat, 28 Nov 2009 13:23:39 -0500 writes:
DM> On 26/11/2009 12:38 PM, Barry Rowlingson wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
>>
>>> This sounds like a good idea, though I would add a "package" parameter
to
24 matches
Mail list logo
