You currently need builddir != srcdir, which is in any case is
strongly recommended for those building from svn checkouts.
We will either require that (many projects now do) or test building in
the srcdir before the testing period starts. Similar comments hold
about needing GNU make -- it is
Full_Name: Ross Boylan
Version: 2.7.1
OS: linux
Submission from: (NULL) (38.99.193.74)
The help says
Optionally,
functions 'user_unif_nseed' and 'user_unif_seedloc' can be
supplied which are called with no arguments and should return
pointers to the number of seeds and to an i
On Aug 18, 2009, at 17:06 , Ben Bolker wrote:
Should I expect to be able to build 2.10 at the moment?
Yes (it works on my system) - when in doubt pull a fresh checkout (in
general you cannot expect svn updates to build without full cleanup
due to possible changes in the build process).
Should I expect to be able to build 2.10 at the moment?
Ubuntu intrepid
Linux bolker-lap2 2.6.27-14-generic #1 SMP Wed Jul 29 09:01:45 UTC 2009
i686 GNU/Linux
Gnu Make 3.81
gcc 4.3.2
===
svn update
Restored 'src/library/Makefile.in'
At revision 49309.
./configure
[...]
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 18:58:27 +0200, Martin Morgan
wrote:
Vitalie S. wrote:
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 15:42:48 +0200, Martin Morgan
wrote:
"Vitalie S." writes:
Dear Developers,
In current implementation of validity method, objects are first
coerced to superclass (slots are striped). Thus, i
Vitalie S. wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 15:42:48 +0200, Martin Morgan
> wrote:
>
>> "Vitalie S." writes:
>>
>>> Dear Developers,
>>>
>>> In current implementation of validity method, objects are first
>>> coerced to superclass (slots are striped). Thus, it is not possible
>>> to write validity
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 15:42:48 +0200, Martin Morgan
wrote:
"Vitalie S." writes:
Dear Developers,
In current implementation of validity method, objects are first
coerced to superclass (slots are striped). Thus, it is not possible
to write validity method which would perform some checks on
On 18/08/2009 9:53 AM, Jeffrey J. Hallman wrote:
replying to myself here, in lieu of replying to several others
jhall...@frb.gov (Jeffrey J. Hallman) writes:
One hassle I could do without is the necessity of writing C wrapper functions
like this:
void fameInit(int *status){
cfmini(status);
"Vitalie S." writes:
> Dear Developers,
>
> In current implementation of validity method, objects are first
> coerced to superclass (slots are striped). Thus, it is not possible
> to write validity method which would perform some checks on children
> slots.
>
> Say, I want to check if number of
replying to myself here, in lieu of replying to several others
jhall...@frb.gov (Jeffrey J. Hallman) writes:
> One hassle I could do without is the necessity of writing C wrapper functions
> like this:
>
> void fameInit(int *status){
> cfmini(status);
> return;
> }
>
> when I want to call a l
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Jeffrey J. Hallman wrote:
> One hassle I could do without is the necessity of writing C wrapper functions
> like this:
>
> void fameInit(int *status){
> cfmini(status);
> return;
> }
>
> when I want to call a library function (cfmini, in this case) that takes an
>
On 17/08/2009 10:23 AM, Jeffrey J. Hallman wrote:
One hassle I could do without is the necessity of writing C wrapper functions
like this:
void fameInit(int *status){
cfmini(status);
return;
}
when I want to call a library function (cfmini, in this case) that takes an
int argument. The .C
Yohan Chalabi wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> It seems that a package (pkgB) using another package (pkgA) with S4
> generics formed by taking existing functions (for example 'plot') must
> not import the existing functions ('plot') in its namespace to avoid
> the warning "replacing previous import: plot".
On 17/08/2009 6:03 PM, Ben Bolker wrote:
> the version 2 parser thinks I have unnecessary braces,
> but I can't find any. False positive or am I missing
> something? If a false positive, is there any way to
> work around the warning?
The problem is that % in Rd is different than % in LaTeX:
Just a guess but try writing it on one line without the % symbols.
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Ben Bolker wrote:
>
> the version 2 parser thinks I have unnecessary braces,
> but I can't find any. False positive or am I missing
> something? If a false positive, is there any way to
> work ar
Jeff,
On Aug 17, 2009, at 10:23 , Jeffrey J. Hallman wrote:
One hassle I could do without is the necessity of writing C wrapper
functions
like this:
void fameInit(int *status){
cfmini(status);
return;
}
when I want to call a library function (cfmini, in this case) that
takes an
int argu
I am looking to have slot in an S4 class definition that can take any
(S3 or S4) object. The ANY class seemed to be a good candidate, but the
is() function definition performs an S3Case test before checking if
methods:::.identC(class2, "ANY"). The result is the is() function does
not consider v
Full_Name: Kurt Rudahl
Version: 2.8.1
OS: SuSE Linux 10.2, i586
Submission from: (NULL) (203.209.31.220)
During build, it halted with several errors of general form
lstat64 already defined
After searches on the web, which revealed many people having
similar problems in areas other then R, I
One hassle I could do without is the necessity of writing C wrapper functions
like this:
void fameInit(int *status){
cfmini(status);
return;
}
when I want to call a library function (cfmini, in this case) that takes an
int argument. The .C interface only lets me pass a pointer to an int, rat
Dear Developers,
In current implementation of validity method, objects are first coerced to
superclass (slots are striped). Thus, it is not possible to write validity
method which would perform some checks on children slots.
Say, I want to check if number of slots in a class is equal to "n"
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 10:34:55AM +0100, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> This was not implemented in R 2.9.x -- the comments in check.in don't
> agree with the usage, and it seemed unlikely that anyone really wanted
> this (it can be very slow, so perhaps a test at a time?), so this was
> intentiona
I can fit a line to a set of given points, e.g.,
> sm.fit <- smooth.spline(1:4,1:4)
> lm.fit <- lm(y~x, data=list(x=1:4,y=1:4))
Now I have two objects representing the straight line y(x)=x, of class
"smooth.spline" and "lm", respectively.
And as could be expected in object orientation, both have
On Sun, 2009-08-16 at 21:24 +0200, Petr Savicky wrote:
> Dear Ross Boylan:
>
> Some time ago, you sent an email to R-devel with the following.
> > I got into this because I'm trying to extend the rsprng code; sprng
> > returns its state as a vector of bytes. Converting these to a vector of
> > in
the version 2 parser thinks I have unnecessary braces,
but I can't find any. False positive or am I missing
something? If a false positive, is there any way to
work around the warning?
* checking Rd files against version 2 parser ... WARNING
Warning: ./man/dbetabinom.Rd:32-34: Unnecessary bra
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 12:25:57PM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
> > Seeding by a vector is also available in the initialization of Mersenne
> > Twister
> > from 2002. See mt19937ar.c (ar for array) at
> > http://www.math.sci.hiroshima-u.ac.jp/~m-mat/MT/emt.html
> > Unfortunately, seeding by a vecto
25 matches
Mail list logo
