The eurodist dataset (my favorite for mds) is malformed. Instead of a
standard distance matrix, it's a data frame. The rownames have gotten
'bumped' to a new anonymous dimension "X". It's possible to fix the data,
but it messes up a lot of example code out there.
X Athens Barcelona B
William Dunlap wrote:
Running his example under valgrind (a memory misuse checker on Linux)
does show it using memory it should not be using in the optimization C
code
around where it is copying the gradient vector. The
==10916== Invalid read of size 1
==10916==at 0x400686D: memcpy (mc_r
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 04:02:28PM +0200, Martin Maechler wrote:
> > "PS" == Petr Savicky
> > on Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:50:46 +0200 writes:
>
> PS> Let me add the following to the discussion of identical(0, -0).
> PS> I would like to suggest to replace the paragraph
>
> PS>
Fabio Mathias Corrêa skrev:
I am writing a function in fortran 95, but the intrinsic function MATMUL is not
working properly. Here's an example.
SUBROUTINE mymult(x,y,res,m,n)
IMPLICIT NONE
INTEGER :: m,n
REAL :: x, y, res
Is REAL in Fortran 95 the same as "dou
> "PS" == Petr Savicky
> on Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:50:46 +0200 writes:
PS> Let me add the following to the discussion of identical(0, -0).
PS> I would like to suggest to replace the paragraph
PS> 'identical' sees 'NaN' as different from 'NA_real_', but all
PS> 'NaN's are
> "JC" == Jon Clayden
> on Wed, 12 Aug 2009 14:57:10 +0100 writes:
>> > Dear all,
>> > The version of readBin() in R-devel includes a use of match(),
through
>> > `%in%`, which can affect its performance significantly. By using
>> > primitives instead of t
> > Dear all,
> > The version of readBin() in R-devel includes a use of match(), through
> > `%in%`, which can affect its performance significantly. By using
> > primitives instead of the rather expensive call to match(), I reduce
> > the time spent inside readBin() by more than 30%
> Jon Clayden
> on Tue, 11 Aug 2009 17:51:46 +0100 writes:
> Dear all,
> The version of readBin() in R-devel includes a use of match(), through
> `%in%`, which can affect its performance significantly. By using
> primitives instead of the rather expensive call to match
Let me add the following to the discussion of identical(0, -0).
I would like to suggest to replace the paragraph
'identical' sees 'NaN' as different from 'NA_real_', but all
'NaN's are equal (and all 'NA' of the same type are equal).
in ?identical by the following text, which is a correction
I am writing a function in fortran 95, but the intrinsic function MATMUL is not
working properly. Here's an example.
SUBROUTINE mymult(x,y,res,m,n)
IMPLICIT NONE
INTEGER :: m,n
REAL :: x, y, res
DIMENSION :: x(m,n), y(n,m), res(m,m)
res = MATMUL(x,y
10 matches
Mail list logo