Thanks, everyone, for all the responses!
Ted.
On 05-Feb-09 20:48:33, Ted Harding wrote:
> Hi Folks,
> Maybe I've missed it already being available somehow,
> but if the following isn't available I'd like to suggest it.
>
> If you're happy to let plot() choose its own limits,
> then of course plot
Or use range( 0, y1, y2, y3, na.rm=TRUE, finite=TRUE )
--
Gregory (Greg) L. Snow Ph.D.
Statistical Data Center
Intermountain Healthcare
greg.s...@imail.org
801.408.8111
> -Original Message-
> From: William Dunlap [mailto:wdun...@tibco.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 2:38 PM
> T
> -Original Message-
> From: r-devel-boun...@r-project.org
> [mailto:r-devel-boun...@r-project.org] On Behalf Of Greg Snow
> Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 1:15 PM
> To: marc_schwa...@comcast.net; ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
> Cc: R-Devel
> Subject: Re: [Rd] "open-ended" plot limits?
I use range( 0, y ) rather than c(0, max(y)), that way if there are any y
values less than 0, the limits still include them (and it is slightly shorter
:-).
This also extends to cases where you may know that you will be adding
additional data using points or lines, so you can do ylim=range(0, y
On 2/5/2009 3:48 PM, (Ted Harding) wrote:
Hi Folks,
Maybe I've missed it already being available somehow,
but if the following isn't available I'd like to suggest it.
If you're happy to let plot() choose its own limits,
then of course plot(x,y) will do it.
If you know what limits you want, then
on 02/05/2009 02:48 PM (Ted Harding) wrote:
> Hi Folks,
> Maybe I've missed it already being available somehow,
> but if the following isn't available I'd like to suggest it.
>
> If you're happy to let plot() choose its own limits,
> then of course plot(x,y) will do it.
>
> If you know what limit
Hi Folks,
Maybe I've missed it already being available somehow,
but if the following isn't available I'd like to suggest it.
If you're happy to let plot() choose its own limits,
then of course plot(x,y) will do it.
If you know what limits you want, then
plot(x,y,xlim=c(x0,x1),ylim(y0,y1)
will d
Everyone,
I know that this has been discussed a few times on the list, but I
think that there is a high false positive rate of messages from
findGlobals during R CMD check (I know the help page has that "The
result is an approximation").
Here are two examples of from the caret package:
This func
(no cc to r-bugs)
One obvious work around is to use an editor that lets you comment/
uncomment many lines of code at once. ESS/Emacs for example, has this
feature. Many other editors do as well. I actually find it easier to
see what is commented out this way.
Clearly this does not address
Apparently the fix was simpler than I anticipated (at least for Prof. Ripley).
Thanks for finding and implementing this improvement.
--
Gregory (Greg) L. Snow Ph.D.
Statistical Data Center
Intermountain Healthcare
greg.s...@imail.org
801.408.8111
> -Original Message-
> From: Prof Brian
Erik,
fist, this is not a bug in R (not a bug at all, really), so we
specifically ask you to not waste other people's time and report it to
the maintainers. It is about a contributed package and there is a
mailing list specifically for JGR
http://mailman.rz.uni-augsburg.de/mailman/listinfo
Hello,
There is a function captureAll() in the svMisc package on CRAN. Although
in its current version, it simulates textual output you got at the
console, it should be rather easy to modify it to return separately
output, errors and warnings. There is one point to consider: the
function cann
The result of proj() is not currently coerced to data.frame
when requested. I use this capability pedagogically all the time.
It did work when I wrote proj() for the Chambers and Hastie book, and
it still works in S-Plus. A minimal repair is in the as.data.frame.aovproj
definition below.
Rich
johnc.d...@yahoo.com wrote:
> Full_Name: John C. Deva
> Version: 2.8.1
> OS: Fedora Linux 8, 64 bit
> Submission from: (NULL) (193.200.150.189)
>
>
> I notice that it is possible to redefine 'if' as a function of an arbitrary
> number of arguments. Such redefined 'if' can then be used as any other
johnc.d...@yahoo.com wrote:
> Full_Name: John C. Deva
> Version: 2.8.1
> OS: Fedora Linux 8, 64 bit
> Submission from: (NULL) (193.200.150.189)
>
>
> I notice that it is possible to redefine 'if' as a function of an arbitrary
> number of arguments. Such redefined 'if' can then be used as any oth
[Moved to R-devel, where it probably should have started and it is
getting to C-level functions now.]
abline is not 'misbehaving' (don't be rude about the work of
volunteers who are in your audience), but behaving in the same way as
other graphics calls.
The real story is this (and R is Open
Full_Name: John C. Deva
Version: 2.8.1
OS: Fedora Linux 8, 64 bit
Submission from: (NULL) (193.200.150.189)
I notice that it is possible to redefine 'if' as a function of an arbitrary
number of arguments. Such redefined 'if' can then be used as any other user
function, except for that the parser
Full_Name: Erik Lukac
Version: R version 2.8.1 (2008-12-22)
OS: Mac OS 10.5
Submission from: (NULL) (141.84.28.167)
I tried to install JGR, but somehow it doesnt work.
> install.packages("JGR")
Warning in install.packages("JGR") :
argument 'lib' is missing: using
'/Users/erikl/R/i386-apple-
Hello,
sorry for writing here because my problem is not a realt bug but may be
a solution for many people working with R:
I miss the feature for commenting some lines of code at once without
writing a bunch of "#" in front of each line.
This is interesting for trying out some code.
I found some
it's becoming an old story, but here's a bit to be added.
Peter Dalgaard wrote:
> Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>> On 31/01/2009 7:31 AM, Andrew Piskorski wrote:
>>> This (tangential) discussion really should be a separate thread so I
>>> changed the subject line above.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 11:
20 matches
Mail list logo
