Excerpts from Prof Brian Ripley's message of Sat Dec 27 06:59:24 +0100 2008:
> Thank you, but can we see the patch please (no attachement arrived)?
I've posted them online:
http://www.statistik.tu-dortmund.de/~olafm/files/symname-bug.R
http://www.statistik.tu-dortmund.de/~olafm/files/symname-
It seems this was intended to be
distance <- lapply(covar,
function(el, metric) dist(as.matrix(el),
method=metric),
metric = metric)
similarly to Variogram.lme.
Thank you for the report: it will be fixed in t
Thank you, but can we see the patch please (no attachement arrived)?
On Sat, 27 Dec 2008, Olaf Mersmann wrote:
I've stumbled upon a small bug/inconsitency in do_External and do_dotcall:
Here's an example:
% LC_ALL=C R --vanilla < symname-bug.R
R version 2.8.0 (2008-10-20)
*snip*
> optio
I've stumbled upon a small bug/inconsitency in do_External and do_dotcall:
Here's an example:
% LC_ALL=C R --vanilla < symname-bug.R
R version 2.8.0 (2008-10-20)
*snip*
> options(error=expression(0))
> ## Call 'R_GD_nullDevice' with incorrect parameter count:
> .Call("R_GD_nullD
>From the Windows (not R) command line try this (the input you
type is after the > and the output is on the next line). Modify
the ftype line appropriately if the output of assoc is different for you.
C:\tmp2>assoc .pdf
.pdf=AcroExch.Document
C:\tmp2>ftype AcroExch.Document
AcroExch.Document="C:
marcthiba...@tanda.on.ca wrote:
Full_Name: Marc Thibault
Version: 2.8.1
OS: Windows XP Pro SP2
Submission from: (NULL) (216.104.125.106)
I had Adobe Acrobat 5 and Adobe Reader 9 installed. The .pdf "open" association
is to Reader.
When I selected "Help | Manuals(in pdf) | An Introduction to
Full_Name: Marc Thibault
Version: 2.8.1
OS: Windows XP Pro SP2
Submission from: (NULL) (216.104.125.106)
I had Adobe Acrobat 5 and Adobe Reader 9 installed. The .pdf "open" association
is to Reader.
When I selected "Help | Manuals(in pdf) | An Introduction to R", it brought up
the file in Acrob
Hello,
1. Illustrating example:
sessionInfo at the end of this email
library(nlme)
fm1 <- gls(weight ~ Time * Diet, BodyWeight)
Variogram(fm1, form = ~ Time | Rat)[1:10,]
Error in FUN(X[[1L]], ...) : unused argument(s) (method = "euclidean")
2. It appears that the error is caused by the sta
On Fri, 26 Dec 2008, Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D. wrote:
Brian,
Thanks for the comments.
-- I agree that the vector form is more compact. I was using a loop
because I found it to be even more transparent to the class. For a one
time task such as this efficiency is not an issue.
-- I'll make use
Brian,
Thanks for the comments.
-- I agree that the vector form is more compact. I was using a loop
because I found it to be even more transparent to the class. For a one
time task such as this efficiency is not an issue.
-- I'll make use of eval.parent(). I hadn't yet stumbled on that
-- T
We can do nothing about this: that area is managed by Duncan Murdoch (who
is offline for about a week).
http://cran.r-project.org/bin/windows/ does tell you who to contact.
R-devel is never the right place for question about binary distributions
(nor for CRAN pages, for which report to the CRA
Dear all,
it looks like that something is wrong with the
/bin/windows/base/rpatched.html page as it seems pointing to the
2.8.1rc version.
Also, I do not know if it is relevant but notice the dates of the
following files on
ftp://ftp.stat.math.ethz.ch/Software/CRAN/bin/windows/base/
R-2.8.1pat-w
The issue is that you are using [["weights"]] to add an element. It works
for existing eleents as well as for [<- and $<-.
However, I would have done this without a loop
nm <- c("data", "weights", "subset", "na.action")
extras <- nm %in% names(Call)
temp[ nm[extras] ] <
On Thu, 25 Dec 2008, Terry Therneau wrote:
In a few of my test scripts for the survival code I expect warning messages
(I actually try to trigger a couple). Using R BATCH infile outfile these
messages don't end up in outfile, where I can compare them to what was
expected. I don't see an optio
14 matches
Mail list logo
