Re: [Rd] CHAR () and Rmpi

2007-09-28 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
I'm not sure what your sticking point here is. If mpi does not modify data in a (char *) pointer, then that really is a (const char *) pointer and the headers are being unhelpful in not telling the compiler that the data are constant. If that is the case you need to use casts to (char *) and t

[Rd] CHAR () and Rmpi

2007-09-28 Thread Hao Yu
Hi. I am the maintainer of Rmpi package. Now I have a problem regarding the change of CHAR () in R 2.6.0. According to R 2.6.0 NEWS: *** CHAR() now returns (const char *) since CHARSXPs should no longer be modified in place. This change allows compilers to warn or error about i

Re: [Rd] R-Server remotecontrolled via browser-GUI

2007-09-28 Thread Jeffrey Horner
idontwant googeltospyafterme wrote on 09/28/2007 09:33 AM: > dear r-community, > > currently i have a workflow as following: > data in online-MYSQL-database via .csv into R for analysis, results > back to mysql. > generating graphics for reports also. > > that's ok, but i need some process-optimi

Re: [Rd] R-Server remotecontrolled via browser-GUI

2007-09-28 Thread Bos, Roger
In response to Martin's suggestion, if you DID want a fairly simple way to provide light-weight web access to R, Rpad would be a good choice. I actually run SQL Server 2005, Apache, and R/Rpad on the same server, but the usage is very light in terms of number of users. It was pretty quick to set

Re: [Rd] modifying large R objects in place

2007-09-28 Thread Peter Dalgaard
Duncan Murdoch wrote: > On 9/28/2007 7:45 AM, Petr Savicky wrote: > >> On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 12:39:30AM +0200, Peter Dalgaard wrote: >> > ... > >>> Longer-term, I still have some hope for better reference counting, but >>> the semantics of environments make it really ugly -- an envi

Re: [Rd] modifying large R objects in place

2007-09-28 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007, Luke Tierney wrote: > On Fri, 28 Sep 2007, Petr Savicky wrote: [...] >> This leads me to a question. Some of the tests, which I did, suggest >> that gc() may not free all the memory, even if I remove all data >> objects by rm() before calling gc(). Is this possible or I must

Re: [Rd] R-Server remotecontrolled via browser-GUI

2007-09-28 Thread Martin Morgan
Hi Josuah RWebServices might be a different approach. It allows R functions and methods to be deployed as SOAP-based web services, and relies on an underlying Java architecture that uses JMS to separate the web services front end from a collection of R workers (on different machines). This seems m

Re: [Rd] R-Server remotecontrolled via browser-GUI

2007-09-28 Thread Greg Snow
Have you read section 4 of the FAQ? If not, that would be a good place to start. -- Gregory (Greg) L. Snow Ph.D. Statistical Data Center Intermountain Healthcare [EMAIL PROTECTED] (801) 408-8111 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of

[Rd] R-Server remotecontrolled via browser-GUI

2007-09-28 Thread idontwant googeltospyafterme
dear r-community, currently i have a workflow as following: data in online-MYSQL-database via .csv into R for analysis, results back to mysql. generating graphics for reports also. that's ok, but i need some process-optimization. i'd like to run r directly on the webserver. analysis should work

[Rd] this is just a test...

2007-09-28 Thread idontwant googeltospyafterme
...because my messages get rejected due to filter rule match everytime... sorry for any unconviniece. josuah r. __ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Re: [Rd] modifying large R objects in place

2007-09-28 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 9/28/2007 7:45 AM, Petr Savicky wrote: > On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 12:39:30AM +0200, Peter Dalgaard wrote: ... >> Longer-term, I still have some hope for better reference counting, but >> the semantics of environments make it really ugly -- an environment can >> contain an object that contains

Re: [Rd] modifying large R objects in place

2007-09-28 Thread Luke Tierney
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007, Petr Savicky wrote: > On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 12:39:30AM +0200, Peter Dalgaard wrote: > [...] >>> nrow <- function(...) dim(...)[1] >>> ncol <- function(...) dim(...)[2] >>> >>> At least in my environment, the new versions preserved NAMED == 1. I believe this is a bug in the

Re: [Rd] modifying large R objects in place

2007-09-28 Thread Petr Savicky
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 12:39:30AM +0200, Peter Dalgaard wrote: [...] > >nrow <- function(...) dim(...)[1] > >ncol <- function(...) dim(...)[2] > > > >At least in my environment, the new versions preserved NAMED == 1. > > > Yes, but changing the formal arguments is a bit messy, is it not? Specif