On Thu, 23 Aug 2007, Denham Robert wrote:
>>> For various reasons,
>> I think it is only courteous to mention some good reasons if you want
> to take up people's time.
>
> Some of the reasons we would like a cygwin version aren't necessarily
> good reasons. We have been using cygwin for sometime,
>> For various reasons,
>I think it is only courteous to mention some good reasons if you want
to take up people's time.
Some of the reasons we would like a cygwin version aren't necessarily
good reasons. We have been using cygwin for sometime, mostly to deal
with scripting in a combined windows/
On 8/22/2007 11:50 AM, Martin Maechler wrote:
> Consider this example code
>
> c1 <- letters[1:7]; c2 <- LETTERS[1:7]
> c1[2] <- c2[3:4] <- NA
> rbind(c1,c2)
>
> ## [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5] [,6] [,7]
> ## c1 "a" NA "c" "d" "e" "f" "g"
> ## c2 "A" "B" NA NA "E" "F" "G"
Consider this example code
c1 <- letters[1:7]; c2 <- LETTERS[1:7]
c1[2] <- c2[3:4] <- NA
rbind(c1,c2)
## [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5] [,6] [,7]
## c1 "a" NA "c" "d" "e" "f" "g"
## c2 "A" "B" NA NA "E" "F" "G"
paste(c1,c2)
## -> [1] "a A" "NA B" "c NA" "d NA" "e E"
Petr Savicky kindly brought this thread to my attention as I'm afraid it
had passed me by. As one of the contributors to the earlier discussion
on adding warnings to sweep I would like to give my support to Petr's
proposed patch.
For the record I should say that Petr was right to point out that th
