Re: [Rd] pure R code package for Windows

2007-04-28 Thread Uwe Ligges
You can also use the Windows binary build and check service at http://129.217.207.166 after reading its disclaimer... Uwe Ligges Petr Savicky wrote: > Dear R developers, > > I am using R under Linux, but I would like to share > an extension package with some Windows users. The package > contai

Re: [Rd] pure R code package for Windows

2007-04-28 Thread Gabor Grothendieck
If you want to build it on Windows (rather than do a cross build) there are links to HowTo's in the Links section of this page regarding various Windows tasks: http://code.google.com/p/batchfiles/ On 4/28/07, Petr Savicky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear R developers, > > I am using R under L

Re: [Rd] pure R code package for Windows

2007-04-28 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 4/28/2007 7:50 AM, Petr Savicky wrote: > Dear R developers, > > I am using R under Linux, but I would like to share > an extension package with some Windows users. The package > contains only data and .R scripts. There is no src directory. > > So, I think I do not need a Windows machine with C

Re: [Rd] pure R code package for Windows

2007-04-28 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On Sat, 28 Apr 2007, Petr Savicky wrote: > Dear R developers, > > I am using R under Linux, but I would like to share > an extension package with some Windows users. The package > contains only data and .R scripts. There is no src directory. > > So, I think I do not need a Windows machine with C c

[Rd] pure R code package for Windows

2007-04-28 Thread Petr Savicky
Dear R developers, I am using R under Linux, but I would like to share an extension package with some Windows users. The package contains only data and .R scripts. There is no src directory. So, I think I do not need a Windows machine with C compiler, "make", "sh" and "perl". If I am wrong, pleas

Re: [Rd] Signature of '!' (was Problem with R-2.5.0 patched and Matrix package)

2007-04-28 Thread Martin Maechler
> "BDR" == Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > on Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:57:11 +0100 (BST) writes: BDR> Yes, it works in the release. The essence of the BDR> problem is that Matrix defines an S4 method for '!' BDR> with dispatch on 'e1', but the documentation for '!'