On 10/30/2006 8:50 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Full_Name: Richard Johnston
> Version: 2.4.0
> OS: OS X
> Submission from: (NULL) (69.169.0.241)
>
>
> The confidence interval calculation for prop.test appears incorrect when
> alternative="greater" . The upper limit is always set to 1.. Th
Full_Name: Richard Johnston
Version: 2.4.0
OS: OS X
Submission from: (NULL) (69.169.0.241)
The confidence interval calculation for prop.test appears incorrect when
alternative="greater" . The upper limit is always set to 1.. The lower
limit appears to be correct.
> total=c(250,250)
> succe
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--enig5A700CC15DEABD01445A1B70
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
I have modified the code originally posted to include capability for
arbitrary weightings for the rows
In writing R packages, I need some rudimentary support for matrix/array
in C code and I would also like to use Blas/Lapack functions.
Previously I just rolled out my own (simple) C++ classes. But it
becomes troublesome for multiple packages (having duplicated files and
needing to keep them in sy
Marc Schwartz wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 19:51 +0100, Gregor Gorjanc wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> I have data (also in attached file) in the following form:
>>
>> num1 num2 num3 int1 fac1 fac2 cha1 cha2 Date POSIXt
>> 11 f q 1900-01-01 1900-01-01 01:01:01
>> 2 1.0 131.5 2 a g
Manfred Georg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Also, what is up with the bug tracker? Things in there seem to
> be from 2000-2003 and a couple days after filing a bug I still don't
> see it. Is it being used? And if not, it should probably be disabled,
> so people don't waste their time posting to
Hi,
I would like to see a way to force R to be in interactive mode
with a flag. So that the default behavior of being in interactive
mode if the input is from a keybord can be overridden.
Something like:
R --interactive
R --no-interactive
octave has a flag like this and it words nicely for what
On 10/30/2006 1:08 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Full_Name:
> Version: 2.4.0
> OS: XP
> Submission from: (NULL) (206.180.154.109)
>
>
> party package source download's PDFs (???_8?_??_cgraph.pdf) caused WinZip
> unzip
> of .tar to abort. suggest repkg. :-) THANKS!
This sounds like a Winzip bu
Full_Name:
Version: 2.4.0
OS: XP
Submission from: (NULL) (206.180.154.109)
party package source download's PDFs (???_8?_??_cgraph.pdf) caused WinZip unzip
of .tar to abort. suggest repkg. :-) THANKS!
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.
Hi Philippe!
Sorry to break the threading and formatting, I'm not subscribed to r-devel,
hence just copying from the web archive.
Philippe Grosjean wrote:
>- To know if some R code is complete or is continued to the next line.
> The following trick was suggested by Peter Dalgaard once, but it i
On Oct 30, 2006, at 7:31 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have encountered the same problem as the original poster, Andrew,
> even when matching C and fortran compiler versions. I have tried
> both gcc-3.3 with g77 (version 3.4.3) via
> ./configure CC=gcc-3.3
> and gcc 4.0.0 with gfortran
Hi,
I have encountered the same problem as the original poster, Andrew,
even when matching C and fortran compiler versions. I have tried both
gcc-3.3 with g77 (version 3.4.3) via
./configure CC=gcc-3.3
and gcc 4.0.0 with gfortran (version 4.0.2) via
./configure FC=gfortran
but both resul
On 10/30/2006 5:20 AM, Pfaff, Bernhard Dr. wrote:
> Dear R-maintainer,
>
> in the help-file for 'regexp' I detected the following word redundancy:
>
>
> Is:
> ===
> For basic and extended regular expressions the the collation order is
> taken from the OS's ...
>
Dear R-maintainer,
in the help-file for 'regexp' I detected the following word redundancy:
Is:
===
For basic and extended regular expressions the the collation order is
taken from the OS's ...
^^^
Should read:
For basic and extended reg
14 matches
Mail list logo
