Sorry, I should have been clearer. This is definitely not
a high-priority item and I hadn't intended it to be
included for 2.3.0.
Sure, I'll provide the code and help page adjustment.
Peter Ehlers
Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Peter Ehlers wrote:
>
>> Folks,
>>
>> I would find
Full_Name: Chris Andrews
Version: 2.2.1
OS: Windows
Submission from: (NULL) (128.205.94.95)
The function page for uniroot indicates
If the algorithm does not converge in 'maxiter' steps, a warning
is printed and the current approximation is returned.
I have not been able to get a warni
On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
> On 4/5/06, Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
>>
>>> On 4/5/06, Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> forget abo
On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Peter Ehlers wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I would find it useful to have a formula method for
> stripchart() with 'data' and 'subset' arguments, similar
> to boxplot.formula() whose code can probably be adapted
> fairly easily.
>
> Comments?
Are you offering to provide one?
(Actually
On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Luke Tierney wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
>
>> [...]
>>
>> Now, I was a little surprised that Recall() needed to do a lookup, but R's
>> context only contains the name of the called function and not (a pointer
>> to) the function.
>
> I think the callf
On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
>
>> On 4/5/06, Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
>>>
Hi,
forget about the below details. It is not related to the fact that
th
Folks,
I would find it useful to have a formula method for
stripchart() with 'data' and 'subset' arguments, similar
to boxplot.formula() whose code can probably be adapted
fairly easily.
Comments?
Peter Ehlers
(Win XP)
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailin
On 4/5/06, Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
>
> > Here I think S3 dispatch is very natural. Try the following:
>
> I don't: it is documented to work on a name not an object.
What comes first, the documentation of a method or the method its
On 4/5/06, Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
>
> > On 4/5/06, Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> forget about the below details. It is not related to the f
On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
> On 4/5/06, Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> forget about the below details. It is not related to the fact that
>>> the function is returned from a function. Sorry about tha
On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
> Here I think S3 dispatch is very natural. Try the following:
I don't: it is documented to work on a name not an object.
> page <- function(x, method = c("dput", "print"), ...) UseMethod("page")
>
> page.getAnywhere <- function(x, ..., idx=NULL) {
>
Here I think S3 dispatch is very natural. Try the following:
page <- function(x, method = c("dput", "print"), ...) UseMethod("page")
page.getAnywhere <- function(x, ..., idx=NULL) {
name <- x$name;
objects <- x$obj;
if (length(objects) == 0)
stop("no object named '", name, "' was foun
On 4/5/06, Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > forget about the below details. It is not related to the fact that
> > the function is returned from a function. Sorry about that. I've
> > been troubleshooting soo much I've b
> Prof Brian Ripley writes:
> On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> forget about the below details. It is not related to the fact that
>> the function is returned from a function. Sorry about that. I've
>> been troubleshooting soo much I've been shoting over the target.
On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> forget about the below details. It is not related to the fact that
> the function is returned from a function. Sorry about that. I've
> been troubleshooting soo much I've been shoting over the target. Here
> is a much smaller reproducible e
Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> Is
>
>>the enter point Fortran "orderdata_" absent of the loading table.
>
> a manual translation, and was the underscore there in the original (I
> think it should be, but am just checking).
The extra underscore added is the default behavior of many fortran
Hi,
yesterday I got very useful feedback on what is the best way to return
a function from a function.
Now, I run into a problem calling a returned function that down the
stream uses Recall(). Below is a self-contained example. I took away
yesterday's code for returning a minimal environment fo
Hi,
forget about the below details. It is not related to the fact that
the function is returned from a function. Sorry about that. I've
been troubleshooting soo much I've been shoting over the target. Here
is a much smaller reproducible example:
x <- 1:10
y <- 1:10 + rnorm(length(x))
sp <- sm
Emails to
Edgar Acuna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Federico C. F. Calboli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Hao Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Lopaka Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Maria Kocherginsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
as maintainers of CRAN packages with QC problems that need addressing
for the upcoming 2.3.0 re
19 matches
Mail list logo
