Re: [Quixote-users] Ubuntu "Jaunty" Quixote package broken

2009-05-18 Thread Robert Ladyman
This is installing from source, for both Quixote and mxDateTime. > > Robert Ladyman wrote: > > Debian Lenny behaves better, the standard install supports Quixote when > > running either Python 2.5 or Python 2.4. I know very little about Python > > packaging under Debian/Ubuntu, but I am learning

Re: [Quixote-users] Ubuntu "Jaunty" Quixote package broken

2009-05-18 Thread Michael Watkins
> Robert Ladyman wrote: > Debian Lenny behaves better, the standard install supports Quixote when > running either Python 2.5 or Python 2.4. I know very little about Python > packaging under Debian/Ubuntu, but I am learning more then I ever > intended ... You could always install Quixote from sour

Re: [Quixote-users] Ubuntu "Jaunty" Quixote package broken

2009-05-18 Thread Ian Forbes
Robert Ladyman wrote: > Ian - I've had no luck with Python 2.6 (OpenSuse 11.1) and had to revert to > 11.0 (Python 2.5). I also had the mxDateTime issues. I seem to have run into a brick wall. Ubuntu Jaunty only installs Quixote for Python 2.6. For some reason, even if Python 2.5 is installed is

Re: [Quixote-users] Ubuntu "Jaunty" Quixote package broken

2009-05-18 Thread Robert Ladyman
Ian - I've had no luck with Python 2.6 (OpenSuse 11.1) and had to revert to 11.0 (Python 2.5). I also had the mxDateTime issues. and no, no workaround. One thing that struck me: perhaps Quixote main version numbers (2.5.xx, 2.6.xx or whatever) could match the Python version they run on. t

[Quixote-users] Ubuntu "Jaunty" Quixote package broken

2009-05-18 Thread Ian Forbes
Hi All Others have reported on the "ihooks" import bug, as well as problems with mxDatetime. This post relates to those bugs. I have a site running quixote for some one of our internal applications. It runs on a Debian box currently running "lenny", which by default installs python 2.5 and quixot