.
>>
>> mark
>>
>>
>> On Jun 28, 2013, at 9:12 AM, Salvatore Orlando
>> wrote:
>>
>> Nachi,
>>
>> this wasn't a rank against missing reviews!
>> I hope nobody gets offended.
>>
>> My goal is to see if we can do someth
if we can do something to improve our turnaround times.
> The metric we need to improve, I think, are median time to first review and
> median time to approval/abandon.
> I'd prefer the median compared to the average as a metric.
>
> Salvatore
>
>
> On 28 June 2013 14:54, Nach
Hi Salvatore
Thank you for your pointing this.
I'll improve my review counts.
Best
Nachi
2013/6/28 Salvatore Orlando :
> Not great apparently [1].
> If this were a soccer league among openstack projects, we would have been
> relegated!
>
> As the things stand right now, I am part of the problem,
Hi Gary
IMO, no need to change their name because it is combination of some words
so may be, we can use
quantum.
If we use quantum. no need to update our source code! :P
Nachi
2013/5/10 Gary Kotton :
> Hi,
> Do you think that these guys also need to change their name -
> http://quantumtattoosu
Hi Folks
I faced the problem of unit tests start very slow.
It takes 20sec or something like this.
Do you faced same issue?
Best.
Nachi
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~quantum-core
Post to : quantum-core@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~quantum-core
More hel
I voted for Gary :)
Nachi
2013/3/28 Mark McClain :
> All-
>
> This is a friendly reminder that technical committee voting ends today. One
> of our own, garyk is a candidate. He's done a lot of good work for Quantum
> and he's a contributor to many of the other OpenStack projects and a member
, but forgot to restore it. Usually
>> there is a model where you save any state you muck with in setUp(), modify
>> it during tests, and restore it in tearDown()
>>
>> dan
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Su
Hi Sumit
I have commented on review comment
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/21285/
I faced same problem. it was because of I haven't have teardown method
for cleanup global variable.
Thanks
Nachi
2013/2/6 Sumit Naiksatam :
> I am not sure what's happening here in Jenkins. When the following
> L
Hi Dan, Gary
Now gating looks works fine.
I have seen the regression bug for backport patches also.
So I would like to work on enable gating for stable releases.
In order to do this, some bug fix needed to quantum-debug command
This need command argument change for quantum-debug command.
However
Hi Dan
Thank you for sharing this information
hmm quantum-gate looks succeed.. I'll check the reason
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/19119/
2013/1/16 Sumit Naiksatam :
> Thanks Dan, duly noted. Thanks also to Gary for the earlier heads up. I
> agree with the approach you have suggested in the
Hi Yong
No the pachet didn't go thorough PREROUTING chain
This the iptables log
Dec 12 12:04:16 nim20 kernel: [3090942.400310] FORWARDIN=brq5ed08abf-96
OUT=brq5ed08abf-96 PHYSIN=tapb9a5bbf7-ab PHYSOUT=tap4685e20a-82
MAC=fa:16:3e:9d:2d:6d:fa:16:3e:fd:f2:b6:08:00 SRC=10.1.0.4 DST=10.1.0.1
LEN=84 TO
defined quotas of all tenants.
> quota-show Show quotas of a given tenant
> quota-update Define tenant's quotas not to use defaults.
>
> Thanks
> Yong Sheng Gong
>
> -Nachi Ueno wrote: -
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing Li
Hi Yong
Thank you for your review.
If there are no comment from the others, I'll write docbook tommorow.
Thanks
Nachi
2012/9/19 Nachi Ueno :
> Hi Yong
>
> Thanks!
> I updated doc also.
>
> 2012/9/19 Yong Sheng Gong :
>> Hi Nachi,
>> https://review.openstack.
13 matches
Mail list logo