Re: [Quantum-core] [openstack-dev] Proposed Quantum Port SecurityAPI/Blueprint

2013-01-14 Thread Akihiro MOTOKI
Hi Aaron, # Re-Added openstack-dev > Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 17:05:30 -0800 > From: Aaron Rosen > Subject: Re: [Quantum-core] [openstack-dev] Proposed Quantum Port > SecurityAPI/Blueprint > > Hi Bob, > > You're right I take back what I proposed before. > > How about having a c

Re: [Quantum-core] [openstack-dev] Proposed Quantum Port Security API/Blueprint

2013-01-14 Thread Aaron Rosen
Hi Bob, You're right I take back what I proposed before. How about having a configuration flag to enforce port_security on shared networks? Aaron On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Robert Kukura wrote: > On 01/14/2013 03:39 PM, Aaron Rosen wrote: > > Hi Akihiro, > > > > Thanks for your feedback

Re: [Quantum-core] [openstack-dev] Proposed Quantum Port Security API/Blueprint

2013-01-14 Thread Robert Kukura
On 01/14/2013 03:39 PM, Aaron Rosen wrote: > Hi Akihiro, > > Thanks for your feedback. Responses inline. > > On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 2:44 AM, Akihiro MOTOKI > wrote: > > Hi Aaron, > > Sorry for the late feedback. > > I have some comments on the spec. > >

Re: [Quantum-core] [openstack-dev] Proposed Quantum Port Security API/Blueprint

2013-01-14 Thread Aaron Rosen
Hi Akihiro, Thanks for your feedback. Responses inline. On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 2:44 AM, Akihiro MOTOKI wrote: > Hi Aaron, > > Sorry for the late feedback. > > I have some comments on the spec. > > - Who can change the port security? If the network physical > infrastructure provides an address

Re: [Quantum-core] Quantum Stable Update

2013-01-14 Thread Edgar Magana
Nice Karma! Nice Job! Edgar On Jan 13, 2013, at 11:44 PM, Gary Kotton wrote: > Hi, > The following list of patches is in review: > > Quantum:- > (Good karma - at least 2 core Quantum reviewers have given +1): > - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/18651/ - atomic database access for > n