Hi Maru,
Thanks, that approach seems reasonable to me. My concern was indeed about
what you classify as functional commits (even if it seems like a trivial
one-liner).
Thanks,
~Sumit.
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Maru Newby wrote:
> Hi Sumit,
>
> I suggest we not require a blueprint/bug a
Hi Sumit,
I suggest we not require a blueprint/bug association for every commit. All
functional commits, yes, but having blueprints/bugs for non-functional commits
(which can often be trivial in nature) would seem a waste of time and effort.
What constitutes non-functional would be left to c
Hi,
My understanding has been from the very beginning that we have a policy of
associating every submitted review with a blueprint or a bug. Is it still
the case?
If not, it would be a good policy to enforce since it helps to track
issues. Off late I did see some patches which don't have this inf
Hello Folks,
I a taking some time off in home town Mexico. I will be back in business
January 4th.
I want to wish you all Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!
Thanks,
Edgar Magana
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~quantum-core
Post to : quantum-core@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe :
4 matches
Mail list logo