[qpsmtpd] prefork 0.81 (with previously discussed fixes) - auth issues?

2009-06-03 Thread b-sub-3eaf217
After going live, it appears that there may be some issues. In particular, I have complaints that people are unable to connect and authenticate for outbound SMTP. These are clients using Outlook, Thunderbird, etc. They are required to authenticate. While on the phone with some, I see three situati

Re: [qpsmtpd] prefork 0.81 (with previously discussed fixes) - auth issues?

2009-06-03 Thread b-sub-3eaf217
I downloaded the 0.82 distribution, and did a diff of the prefork scripts, and made the two changes required, then restarted with debug logging. Here's my connection from a Windows client running Thunderbird, connecting to port 587 with SSL selected, and a previously working login: running plugin

Re: [qpsmtpd] prefork 0.81 (with previously discussed fixes) - auth issues?

2009-06-03 Thread b-sub-3eaf217
Interesting (but not related) - I found a message that was obviously a mix between two different senders, via prefork. I thought I had traced the auth problem to a script that called a module that couldn't locate DBI (used to access a flat file). However, it was just because the @INC was different

Re: [qpsmtpd] prefork 0.81 (with previously discussed fixes) - auth issues?

2009-06-03 Thread b-sub-3eaf217
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Ask Bj?rn Hansen wrote: > On Jun 3, 2009, at 13:26, b-sub-3eaf...@rope.net wrote: > > > Interesting (but not related) - I found a message that was obviously a mix > > between two different senders, via prefork. > > It's odd (and frustrating) that you have so much trouble with p

Re: [qpsmtpd] prefork 0.81 (with previously discussed fixes) - auth issues?

2009-06-03 Thread b-sub-3eaf217
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Ask Bj?rn Hansen wrote: > It's odd (and frustrating) that you have so much trouble with prefork. > Did you try using the regular fork server instead? I suspect that's the > most commonly used "transport" and thus very well tested. Unfortunately, I have decided to implement my