[perl #38347] rhsbl patch to allow TXT entries

2006-01-28 Thread Shad L. Lords
# New Ticket Created by "Shad L. Lords" # Please include the string: [perl #38347] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38347 > It appears that most rhsbl entries now contain txt entries. I'v

Patch for rhsbl and TXT records

2006-01-28 Thread Shad L. Lords
I've created a patch that will allow the rhsbl plugin to use TXT records. See attached. -Shad rhsbl.patch Description: Binary data

Re: [perl #38347] rhsbl patch to allow TXT entries

2006-02-27 Thread Shad L. Lords
It appears that most rhsbl entries now contain txt entries. I've patch the plugin to behave similar to dnsbl but also maintain backward compability. If you just list the server it will use the TXT entry. If you pass a second arg then it will pass that back to the client. I was applying this

Re: sme server patch to allow relay to badrcptto

2009-11-04 Thread Shad L. Lords
Filippo Carletti wrote: In sme server we have some email aliases defined as visible=internal, that is internal users (relayclients) could write to them, but from outside the lan (non relay clients) the email address is not reachable (non existent). (http://github.com/filippocarletti/qpsmtpd/blob

Re: Move clamav headers at top

2009-11-05 Thread Shad L. Lords
Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote: On Nov 5, 2009, at 10:31, Shad L. Lords wrote: This might not be the best place to fix this. The correct way would be to fix header->add to always stick the headers at the top. Sounds good to me. Would that mess up anything else? The only thing to be aware of

Re: sme server patch to allow relay to badrcptto

2009-11-05 Thread Shad L. Lords
Robert Spier wrote: Charlie Brady wrote: On Wed, 4 Nov 2009, Filippo Carletti wrote: In sme server we have some email aliases defined as visible=internal, that is internal users (relayclients) could write to them, but from outside the lan (non relay clients) the email address is not reachab

Re: Move clamav headers at top

2009-11-05 Thread Shad L. Lords
Robert Spier wrote: Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote: On Nov 5, 2009, at 10:31, Shad L. Lords wrote: This might not be the best place to fix this. The correct way would be to fix header->add to always stick the headers at the top. Sounds good to me. Would that mess up anything else?

Re: Move clamav headers at top

2009-11-05 Thread Shad L. Lords
Johan Almqvist wrote: On 5. nov. 2009, at 19.55, Shad L. Lords wrote: Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote: On Nov 5, 2009, at 10:31, Shad L. Lords wrote: This might not be the best place to fix this. The correct way would be to fix header->add to always stick the headers at the top. Sounds good to