based on that in a short time-span after
the trap was hit, and possibly accept the spam, spool it and feed it to
sa-learn when the load is low. Does that sound like something that can
be Quite Easily Done?
Cheers,
Kjetil
--
Kjetil Kjernsmo
Programmer / Astrophysicist / Ski-orienteer / Orienteer /
On Thursday 06 July 2006 16:00, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> Yup. It seems localhost is hard coded. Should be fairly simple to
> patch.
Hmmm, OK! So, could you good folks have a look at the attached patch to
see if it does the trick...? :-)
I didn't quite dare to test it on my production system, thoug
On Friday 07 July 2006 19:49, Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote:
> I didn't quite dare to test it on my production system, though... :-)
FWIW, I did now, and I think it did do the trick! :-) I hope you the
right guy will consider it for inclusion in the SA plugin.
I'm seeing some problems wi
Hi all!
I guess it is my damned duty to read the postmaster and abuse addresses
even if they come from hosts that would be blocked. Is there an easy
way to accept just these two local parts early, to let them pass
unhindered through all the barbed wire and mines?
Cheers,
Kjetil
--
Kjetil
spam to document it, and
SpamAssassin blocks it. That would have been kinda nasty. But that's an
issue for the spamassassin plugin, perhaps?
Cheers,
Kjetil
--
Kjetil Kjernsmo
Programmer / Astrophysicist / Ski-orienteer / Orienteer / Mountaineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage: http://www.kjetil.kjernsmo.net/ OpenPGP KeyID: 6A6A0BBC
'll put up a .tar.gz shortly.
Oh, cool! I have to give that another good look when I got time. It just
entered my TODO-list! Thanks!
Cheers,
Kjetil
--
Kjetil Kjernsmo
Programmer / Astrophysicist / Ski-orienteer / Orienteer / Mountaineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage: http://www.kjetil.kjernsmo
bounces back at my
postmaster address. So, I get a hundred failure notices a day... :-(
I guess I should discard those...? Even if that means the risk of not
discovering that something is wrong somewhere here...
Anyone know how to do that?
Cheers,
Kjetil
--
Kjetil Kjernsmo
Programmer
Hi and thanks for all the responses!
On Friday 20 October 2006 21:02, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
> On Oct 19, 2006, at 12:29, Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote:
> > So, when they hit an undeliverable address, the bounce bounces back
> > at that non-existant address on my domain, which again boun
that means I'm following bad practice, I suppose... Hmmm,
*testing*, eh, right, qpsmtpd accepts the message, qmail-send
subsequently bounces it.
I have to correct that situation... Perhaps correcting that would also
solve the double-bounce problem, too...
Cheers,
Kjetil
--
Kjetil
the logs nor the headers of the bounce. But I
scheduled a check with ORDB now, just to be sure... :-)
Cheers,
Kjetil
--
Kjetil Kjernsmo
Programmer / Astrophysicist / Ski-orienteer / Orienteer / Mountaineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage: http://www.kjetil.kjernsmo.net/ OpenPGP KeyID: 6A6A0BBC
look as if it would support this... Since this is a -default, it would
presumably need to call that mailman script thingie to finally decide
also... This sounds more complex than I first thought...
Best,
Kjetil
--
Kjetil Kjernsmo
Programmer / Astrophysicist / Ski-orienteer / Orienteer / M
d to run to figure
out... Possible?
A nasty, but quick and simple solution is to create a plugin that denies
messages with the string "I tried to deliver a bounce message to this
address, but the bounce bounced!" in DATA... What do people think about
that?
Cheers,
Kjetil
--
Kjeti
onest mistake (one valid user and a user who
recently left in the CC list, for example).
If this looks sane, it would be pretty trivial to implement VRFY the
same way, but is that sane to do nowadays, or will it just mean less
work for spammers?
Cheers,
Kjetil
--
Kjetil Kjernsmo
Programmer /
pipe it to sa-learn or similar.
> > If this looks sane, it would be pretty trivial to implement VRFY
> > the same way, but is that sane to do nowadays, or will it just mean
> > less work for spammers?
>
> Anybody can get the same information with RCPT that they could get
>
Hi again!
My little plugin isn't working as intended... :-( BTW, Peter, I looked
more carefully at yours, but I don't really have an aliases list...
On Monday 13 November 2006 21:34, Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote:
> Just checked it in:
> http://svn.kjernsmo.net/qpsmtpd-chec
$later. :-)
Cheers,
Kjetil
--
Kjetil Kjernsmo
Programmer / Astrophysicist / Ski-orienteer / Orienteer / Mountaineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage: http://www.kjetil.kjernsmo.net/ OpenPGP KeyID: 6A6A0BBC
frozen yesterday. So, unless there
are release-critical bugs in 0.32, something I'm not aware of, we will
have to rely on backports.
Best,
Kjetil
--
Kjetil Kjernsmo
Programmer / Astrophysicist / Ski-orienteer / Orienteer / Mountaineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage: http://www.kjetil.kjernsmo.net/ OpenPGP KeyID: 6A6A0BBC
ooh[19374]: 221 pooh.kjernsmo.net closing
connection. Have a wonderful day.
Wed Dec 13 10:12:18 2006 pooh[19374]: logging::file
Wed Dec 13 10:12:18 2006 pooh[19374]: dnsbl
Wed Dec 13 10:12:19 2006 pooh[19129]: cleaning up after 19374
So, is it me saying funny things to murphy.debian.org, or is that
On Wednesday 13 December 2006 22:55, Johan Almqvist wrote:
> On Dec 13, 2006, at 22:53, Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote:
> > Wed Dec 13 07:26:20 2006 pooh[19374]: uribl
> > Wed Dec 13 10:12:04 2006 pooh[19374]: 874 lookups finished in 30.00
> > sec
>
> What's taking almost
efore qpsmtpd. Perhaps qpsmtpd could
be S19qpsmtpd?
All this feel very workaroundish to me, but this is the situation as far
as I understand it. Advice from people with deeper understanding would
be appreciated.
Cheers,
Kjetil
--
Kjetil Kjernsmo
Programmer / Astrophysicist / Ski-orient
use. You can run 'dpkg-reconfigure qpsmtpd' to adjust this if
> needed.
I think I've got that now, at least it works! :-)
Thanks again,
Kjetil
--
Kjetil Kjernsmo
Programmer / Astrophysicist / Ski-orienteer / Orienteer / Mountaineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage: http://www.kjetil.kjernsmo.net/ OpenPGP KeyID: 6A6A0BBC
http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/TaskForces/CommunityProjects/FOAFWhitelisting
There are allready 15-20 million FOAF profiles out there, enough to make
this useful from day 1, and I figured more people here might want to
get involved.
Cheers,
Kjetil
--
Kjetil Kjernsmo
Programmer
Hi all!
There's a pretty nice web-based monitoring system called Munin:
http://munin.projects.linpro.no/
I'd like to create some Munin plugins for qpsmtpd (if it hasn't been
done allready). In particular, I'd like to find out how many emails are
denied and accepted by the various qpsmtpd plugin
On Sunday 20 May 2007, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
> Another way is to write a specialized logging plugin which writes
> only the entries you are interested in to an extra log file (or a
> database) which can then be quickly scanned.
Right, this sounds like a good approach.
Perhaps a qpsmtpd logging p
On Wednesday 23 May 2007, Johan Almqvist wrote:
> Try again, or see below.
> --snipsnap--
> How to create RRDtools statistics
OK, cool!
Reviewing it, it seems like it is quite close to Munin plugins. Munin
uses RRDTool too, but has a fairly nice and consistent framework for
monitoring a lot of
coding yet, and
it looks like you allready did what I needed, so thanks a lot! :-)
Cheers,
Kjetil
--
Kjetil Kjernsmo
Programmer / Astrophysicist / Ski-orienteer / Orienteer / Mountaineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage: http://www.kjetil.kjernsmo.net/ OpenPGP KeyID: 6A6A0BBC
Hi Rasmus and the rest!
I've just gotten around to install munin on some boxes, which runs fine,
and now I went on to install dlog, which is the most important plugin
that I want to use with munin to monitor my qpsmtpd install, it is a
very interesting thing! I suppose this is a question mainly
On Monday 26 November 2007 06:32, Rasmus Skaarup wrote:
> Normally qpsmtpd ships it's logs within it's service dir, like:
>
> /var/service/qpsmtpd/log/main
Right, well, Debian has its own way of organising things, so I have all
my logs in /var/log, /var/log/qpsmtpd.log specifically, and my logs
to have
the password in cleartext, and that there is no way to use an allready
hashed password due to the ticket used in the challenge?
So, it is simply not possible to use a password which is encrypted on
the host with CRAM-MD5, or is there a workaround?
Cheers,
Kjetil
--
Kjetil Kjernsmo
CRAM-MD5?
So, what I actually want is just to encrypt the password. The email will
go unencrypted over the rest of the network anyway (unless I
PGP-encrypt it), so SSL seems like an unnecessary hassle and overhead
that I'd like to avoid. LOGIN and PLAIN are both freetext, right?
Cheers,
OK, thanks a lot, folks, I'll check it out and see what makes most
sense.
Cheers,
Kjetil
--
Kjetil Kjernsmo
Programmer / Astrophysicist / Ski-orienteer / Orienteer / Mountaineer
kje...@kjernsmo.net
Homepage: http://www.kjetil.kjernsmo.net/ OpenPGP KeyID: 6A6A0BBC
t for some reason, I can't authenticate...
Any ideas?
Cheers,
Kjetil
--
Kjetil Kjernsmo
kje...@kjernsmo.net
http://www.kjetil.kjernsmo.net/
hive.com/d...@spamassassin.apache.org/msg29261.html
but I can't find it in the latest release. I think it might better to spend
the time getting that plugin into shape.
Cheers,
Kjetil
--
Kjetil Kjernsmo
kje...@kjernsmo.net
http://www.kjetil.kjernsmo.net/
duction mail server on Debian, even though certain things are
*cough* somewhat outdated at release. So, I am kinda hoping that this new
release can make into squeeze before it is frozen. Any chance of that?
Cheers,
Kjetil
--
Kjetil Kjernsmo
kje...@kjernsmo.net
http://www.kjetil.kjernsmo.net/
On Thu April 8 2010 Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
> Thanks to Kjetil for the reminder! 0.84 has been released.
>
Hehe, great, thanks a lot! :-)
Kjetil
Has
anyone written such a thing?
Kjetil
--
Kjetil Kjernsmo
kje...@kjernsmo.net
http://www.kjetil.kjernsmo.net/
On Saturday 28. April 2012 13.41.20 Robert Spier wrote:
> > > Maybe the time has come to "do a release" (0.9?) and then open
> > > things up for major cleanups/changes.
>
> This might actually be 0.85, but that's irrelevant.
As someone who prefers to run his production systems with as few deviati
Hi all!
I finally have to get my outgoing SMTP working, and I have to DKIM-sign
them. So, I need to get auth working, the last time I tried, in 2009, I
simply couldn't get it working... That's a long time ago though :-)
But before I start, I still have 0.84, since the box is Debian Jessie.
Doe
On Monday 6. February 2017 01.15.30 frank wrote:
> I literally just did DKIM last week. And the way I did it didn't touch
> qpsmtpd, instead it's a couple helper scripts that feed qmail-remote,
> messages are signed as they're being sent out.
Ah, TIMTOWDI, I like it! :-)
I think wrapping qmail-re
On Sunday 5. February 2017 22.34.36 Matt Simerson wrote:
> Yes, I think it it does.
>
> In 2009, the QP DKIM plugin didn’t support signing. I added that feature
> in 2013.
OK! I'll try the qmail-remote route first.
> > Secondly, I would like to just accept all email unauthenticated from
> > my
>
Hi!
I figured I'd just report back on this:
On Tuesday 7. February 2017 15.13.53 frank wrote:
> >> The DKIM instructions I used:
> >> https://beingasysadmin.wordpress.com/2013/04/30/dkim-signing-in-qmail
> >> /
> >>
> I'm a beginner at DKIM but as far as I can tell DKIM is a superset
> replace
41 matches
Mail list logo