On Sun, 27 Apr 2014, Matt Simerson wrote:
> > and are dealing with the fallout.
>
> I dealt with the "fallout" on my mailing lists in May of 2013:
>
> http://matt.simerson.net/news/2013/05/01/dkim-and-mailing-lists
Your "fix":
> cd path/to/ezmlm/list; rm prefix text/trailer addtrailer
On Sun, 27 Apr 2014, Matt Simerson wrote:
> If you're operating a mailing list, you have 3 choices:
>
>1. Don't break DKIM
>2. If you insist upon breaking DKIM by adding subject prefixes and message
> trailers, take ownership of the message by changing the From address to your
> own do
I'm guessing that Matt didn't intend this information to be private to me.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 09:45:55 -0700
From: Matt Simerson
To: Charlie Brady
Subject: Re: Yahoo's DMARC debacle
On Apr 28, 2014, at 6:13 AM, Charlie Brady
wrote:
> On Sun, 27 A
On Mon, 28 Apr 2014, Matt Simerson wrote:
> > So either DKIM isn't relevant, or something else in my
> > qpsmtpd/qmail/ezmlm-idx chain is breaking DKIM. Any suggestions?
>
> If ezmlm isn't adding a list prefix or message trailers, then it's
> unlikely that ezmlm is breaking the messages DKIM s
On Mon, 28 Apr 2014, Matt Simerson wrote:
> On Apr 28, 2014, at 10:57 AM, Charlie Brady
> wrote:
>
> > I'm guessing that Matt didn't intend this information to be private to me.
>
> Correct, but perl.org is rejecting all messages from domains with DMARC
> p=reject policies, which includes mi
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Charlie Brady <
charlieb-qpsm...@budge.apana.org.au> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 28 Apr 2014, Matt Simerson wrote:
>
> > On Apr 28, 2014, at 10:57 AM, Charlie Brady <
> charlieb-qpsm...@budge.apana.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > > I'm guessing that Matt didn't intend this informat