On Jul 27, 2011, at 16:41, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
> I use dnscache on my home network and would like to know why anybody
> decide to move from dnscache.
Performance, IPv6 support, ease of maintenance (when using dnscache I often end
with subtly differently patched versions; frustrating). Als
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011, Ask Bj?rn Hansen wrote:
> On Jul 27, 2011, at 16:41, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
>
> > I use dnscache on my home network and would like to know why anybody
> > decide to move from dnscache.
>
> Performance,
Could you supply some details, please?
> IPv6 support, ease of maint
On 7/28/2011 10:51 AM, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
On Jul 27, 2011, at 16:41, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
I use dnscache on my home network and would like to know why anybody
decide to move from dnscache.
Performance, IPv6 support, ease of maintenance (when using dnscache I often end
with subtly di
On Jul 28, 2011, at 11:28, Charlie Brady wrote:
>>> I use dnscache on my home network and would like to know why anybody
>>> decide to move from dnscache.
>>
>> Performance,
>
> Could you supply some details, please?
Off the top of my head the two things I'd run into are the outstanding reque
On 7/28/2011 12:09 PM, Chris Lewis wrote:
I'd not use dnscache in corporate/enterprise/high reliability
environments. Unbound is nice and hiccup-free. Bind9 is reasonable
enough. I hear good things about PowerDNS too.
As a FYI, on a machine running qpsmtpd, handling up to 10M emails per
day,
