On Thu, 18 Jun 2009, Ask Bj?rn Hansen wrote:
On Jun 17, 2009, at 8:13, Filippo Carletti wrote:
+++ qpsmtpd-0.40/plugins/check_spamhelo 2007-06-14 13:21:45.0 -0600
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
for my $bad ($self->qp->config('badhelo')) {
if ($host eq lc $bad) {
$self->log(LOGDEBUG, "
This one's mine.
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009, Filippo Carletti wrote:
See
http://bugs.contribs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3390
for discussion.
diff -Nur -x '*.orig' -x '*.rej' qpsmtpd-0.40/plugins/rhsbl
mezzanine_patched_qpsmtpd-0.40/plugins/rhsbl
--- qpsmtpd-0.40/plugins/rhsbl 2007-06-14 13:57:24.
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009, Filippo Carletti wrote:
http://bugs.contribs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3340
Also me. Here's the background.
Line 195 highlighted:
my ($flag, $hits, $required);
while () {
$self->log(LOGDEBUG, "check_spam: spamd: $_");
#warn "GOT FROM SPAMD1: $_";
last unless m
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009, Filippo Carletti wrote:
This is needed to use clamav-0.95 which changed an option.
http://bugs.contribs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5108
Jonathan Martens
--- qpsmtpd-0.40/plugins/virus/clamav.fixClamscanParameterChange
2009-03-28
08:47:34.0 +0100
+++ qpsmtpd-
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009, Filippo Carletti wrote:
http://bugs.contribs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3098
Shad L. Lords
--- qpsmtpd-0.40/plugins/virus/clamav 2007-06-14 11:57:23.0 -0600
+++ mezzanine_patched_qpsmtpd-0.40/plugins/virus/clamav 2007-06-14
17:46:23.0 -0600
@@ -139,6 +139,9
Charlie Brady wrote:
It's not as though there are any SMTP clients out there which will try
again with a different helo host. Unless there is a spambot tuned for this
qpsmtpd plugin.
There are plenty of bots that do that.
I don't understand your statement here. In what way would any client b
I like this approach, but it's had its complications for us because we
don't want to make the compromise of doing the rest of the checks at a
given stage needlessly; e.g. if our RBL plugin hits, we don't want to
bother doing RDNS and SPF lookups only to say 'sorry, you were on an
RBL' afterward
Jared Johnson wrote:
I like this approach, but it's had its complications for us because we
don't want to make the compromise of doing the rest of the checks at a
given stage needlessly; e.g. if our RBL plugin hits, we don't want to
bother doing RDNS and SPF lookups only to say 'sorry, you were
