Re: Downing the service (Re: [qpsmtpd] 0.81 Can prefork listen on more than one port?)

2009-05-23 Thread Charlie Brady
On Fri, 22 May 2009, Charlie Brady wrote: On Fri, 22 May 2009, J wrote: However, I'm back to seeing the connection processes being left behind, despite an explicit quit from the remote host. I suspect this is due to not using a queueing plugin, at this point. I also see that 'svc -d' lea

Re: [qpsmtpd] Downing the service (Re: 0.81 Can prefork listen on more than one port?)

2009-05-23 Thread Charlie Brady
On Fri, 22 May 2009, J wrote: My current 'run' file (posted in previous message(s)): = #!/bin/sh exec 2>&1 \ No, that's not what you have. You've deleted the trailing backslash, right? sh -c ' exec \ /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 1

Re: Downing the service (Re: [qpsmtpd] 0.81 Can prefork listen on more than one port?)

2009-05-23 Thread J
On Sat, 23 May 2009, Charlie Brady wrote: > It looks to me as though qpsmtpd should have started a new process group with > the parent process, but hasn't. Or the developer assumed that qpsmtpd would be > set up as leader of a process group, but it isn't in this circumstance. > > Try this as your

Re: Downing the service (Re: [qpsmtpd] 0.81 Can prefork listen on more than one port?)

2009-05-23 Thread J
On Sat, 23 May 2009, Charlie Brady wrote: > On Sat, 23 May 2009, J wrote: > > > A manual connection where I connect, helo, then quit - stays in the > > process table. > > If you strace that process, you'll see that it goes back to select() waiting > for a new connection on the socket. You should e

Re: Downing the service (Re: [qpsmtpd] 0.81 Can prefork listen on more than one port?)

2009-05-23 Thread Charlie Brady
On Sat, 23 May 2009, J wrote: A manual connection where I connect, helo, then quit - stays in the process table. If you strace that process, you'll see that it goes back to select() waiting for a new connection on the socket. You should expect each child process to be reused up to 100 times