Hi Steve,
breaking the RFC by guessing how a spam issueing address might look is
not good.
Better is to reject a spam mail directly during connection phase,
because once your mail server has accepted the mail, you _must_ deliver
it to the user anyway (with special tags i.e.), because of data
prot
Has anyone got a working startup for 0.81 prefork?
Stock unpack and make:
The 'run' file runs 'qpsmtpd'. When I connect, I get this:
2009-05-14 18:57:51.130720500 tcpserver: status: 1/10
2009-05-14 18:57:51.130979500 tcpserver: pid 28974 from 10.10.10.23
2009-05-14 18:57:51.822652500 tcpserver:
On Thu, 14 May 2009 18:54:24 + (UTC)
J wrote:
> @40004a0c4fcc2208d26c Use of uninitialized value in pattern match
> (m//) at ./qpsmtpd-prefork line 131.
> @40004a0c4fcc220999a4 Usage: qpsmtpd-prefork [ options ]
> qpsmtpd-prefork parameter usage...
--user $USER is a required para
On Thu, 14 May 2009, Hanno Hecker wrote:
> On Thu, 14 May 2009 18:54:24 + (UTC)
> J wrote:
>
> > @40004a0c4fcc2208d26c Use of uninitialized value in pattern match
> > (m//) at ./qpsmtpd-prefork line 131.
> > @40004a0c4fcc220999a4 Usage: qpsmtpd-prefork [ options ]
> > qpsmtpd-pre
From: Devin Carraway
---
qpsmtpd-forkserver |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/qpsmtpd-forkserver b/qpsmtpd-forkserver
index 92d133a..9533092 100755
--- a/qpsmtpd-forkserver
+++ b/qpsmtpd-forkserver
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ usage: qpsmtpd-forkserver [ options ]
Applied to my tree as 0e4dbbd229b575a4ff68eca6b2376aad80f8f2a2.
qpsm...@devin.com wrote:
>
> From: Devin Carraway
>
> ---
> qpsmtpd-forkserver |2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/qpsmtpd-forkserver b/qpsmtpd-forkserver
> index 92d133a..9533092 10075
