Re: [qpsmtpd] accept without delivery

2009-04-06 Thread Steve Kemp
On Sun Apr 05, 2009 at 23:44:12 +, b-sub-564...@rope.net wrote: > Clear as mud? Pretty much :) > What I am thinking of doing is to have my routine return DECLINED after > identifying something to sideline, then set a note. The note would be read > by queue/qmail-queue and, if set, just sil

Re: [qpsmtpd] accept without delivery

2009-04-06 Thread Robert Spier
> > What I am thinking of doing is to have my routine return DECLINED after > identifying something to sideline, then set a note. The note would be read > by queue/qmail-queue and, if set, just silently drop it. Hopefully a minor > kludge to qmail-queue. > > Or is it possible to tell the sender,

Re: [qpsmtpd] accept without delivery

2009-04-06 Thread Chris Lewis
b-sub-564...@rope.net wrote: I have a routine that I'm working on that is still rather imperfect. Ideally, it would identify a particular type of spam and then reject it, as other modules do. However, since there are too many false positives, I have been rejecting, but also sidelining a copy of i

Re: [qpsmtpd] accept without delivery

2009-04-06 Thread Hanno Hecker
On Sun, 5 Apr 2009 23:44:12 + (UTC) b-sub-564...@rope.net wrote: > What I am thinking of doing is to have my routine return DECLINED after > identifying something to sideline, then set a note. The note would be read > by queue/qmail-queue and, if set, just silently drop it. Hopefully a minor >