On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> Except doesn't work with -async. Well, it works, but blocks.
a deferred approach would help async, as the job to look up the remote
name could get spawned at pre-connection time and it wouldn't have to
block until it was needed, which might
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Jared Johnson wrote:
> I can't say I agree with this patch, even though it would represent a less
> significant change and satisfy more parties.. it would also make it more
> likely for both terms to be used throughout the code, decreasing readability
> and increas
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 08:38:09 -0600, David Nicol wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Matt Sergeant wrote:
>> Except doesn't work with -async. Well, it works, but blocks.
>
> a deferred approach would help async, as the job to look up the remote
> name could get spawned at pre-connection time
