Jared, if you still want Address notes, please submit a patch with
just that functionality.
See address_notes_minor.diff and address_notes_sans_return_self.diff in
this thread :)
-Jared
Robert Spier wrote:
What's the goal of this? It also needs some documentation or examples.
The idea is to allow plugins to do something like:
for my $rcpt ($transaction->recipients) {
do_stuff() if $spam_score > $rcpt->config('spam_threshold');
}
IOW, per-user prefs. This is the first,
Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
>
> I agree that NEXT isn't enormously better; it's a little clearer
> though. Maybe we could come up with something else better? :-/
>
DEFER
PASS_THROUGH
UNHANDLED
CONTINUE
On Jan 11, 2009, at 3:25 PM, Adam Prime wrote:
Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
I agree that NEXT isn't enormously better; it's a little clearer
though. Maybe we could come up with something else better? :-/
DEFER
PASS_THROUGH
UNHANDLED
Probably too easy to confuse with the continuation stuff on -async?
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:29:21 +0100, Johan Almqvist wrote:
> CONTINUE
>
> On Jan 11, 2009, at 3:25 PM, Adam Prime wrote:
>
>> Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
>>>
>>> I agree that NEXT isn't enormously better; it's a little clearer
>>> t
I'm sorry, but I don't understand what the fuss is about.
I've been using qpsmtpd for a number of years, and without knowing very
much Perl, I have been able to customize all of the plugins and write
dozens of my own, without any problems understanding that 'DECLINED' means
that the plugin is exit
Hi everyone,
Let's move the qpsmtpd repository to git. It'll make it much much
easier for people to contribute; in particular since often people
developing on qpsmtpd basically have their private forks - with some
changes to be published and others not.
Test repository (it will change!)
