RE: Problem with revision 946+ of qpsmtpd-forkserver

2008-10-24 Thread Sam Masiello
> -Original Message- > From: Hanno Hecker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 11:56 PM > To: Sam Masiello > Cc: qpsmtpd@perl.org > Subject: Re: Problem with revision 946+ of qpsmtpd-forkserver > > On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:34:35 -0600 > Sam Masiello <[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: Problem with revision 946+ of qpsmtpd-forkserver

2008-10-24 Thread Hanno Hecker
On Fri, 24 Oct 2008 11:05:04 -0600 Sam Masiello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Can you try the attached diff and tell if there are any other > > weird things with this? It should not make any difference, > > since we're in our own process in -forkserver. > This seemed to fix the issue. I now get

RE: Problem with revision 946+ of qpsmtpd-forkserver

2008-10-24 Thread Sam Masiello
> -Original Message- > From: Hanno Hecker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 11:31 AM > To: Sam Masiello > Cc: qpsmtpd@perl.org > Subject: Re: Problem with revision 946+ of qpsmtpd-forkserver > > On Fri, 24 Oct 2008 11:05:04 -0600 > Sam Masiello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: How can I rewrite recipients, cleanly?

2008-10-24 Thread Peter J. Holzer
On 2008-10-22 07:24:49 -0400, John Peacock wrote: > Peter J. Holzer wrote: > > I always found the rcpt_ok plugin in trunk/plugins rather useless for > > two reasons: > > > > 1) it can only check for the recipient domain, not the local part. So it > >cannot reject mails to non-existent recipien