Howdy,
First, thank you all for such a fantastic piece of software.
I've recently been exploring using async for our production mail servers.
We use the tls plugin, which I understand hasn't been re-written for the
async server yet.
First I tried the patch here:
http://www.nntp.perl.org/gro
Douglas Hunter wrote:
Howdy,
First, thank you all for such a fantastic piece of software.
I've recently been exploring using async for our production mail servers.
Why? Are you having issues with the other modes of operation?
Async (at this point) is best suited to systems with very high
On 1-May-08, at 5:20 PM, Chris Babcock wrote:
Douglas Hunter wrote:
Howdy,
First, thank you all for such a fantastic piece of software.
I've recently been exploring using async for our production mail
servers.
Why? Are you having issues with the other modes of operation?
Async (at this po
Chris Babcock wrote:
Douglas Hunter wrote:
Howdy,
First, thank you all for such a fantastic piece of software.
I've recently been exploring using async for our production mail servers.
Why? Are you having issues with the other modes of operation?
Yes, there are too many concurrent conne
Douglas Hunter wrote:
Chris Babcock wrote:
Douglas Hunter wrote:
Howdy,
First, thank you all for such a fantastic piece of software.
I've recently been exploring using async for our production mail
servers.
Why? Are you having issues with the other modes of operation?
Yes, there are
Matt Sergeant wrote:
On 1-May-08, at 5:20 PM, Chris Babcock wrote:
Async (at this point) is best suited to systems with very high
performance and concurrency requirements. If your system can run
without using async, the other modes are simpler to implement and
better tested.
On the other h
Douglas Hunter wrote:
I only tested STARTTLS from the default port with the patch I supplied,
but that seemed to work well. I'm just not confident enough with my
async-fu to recommend that patch to other folks until it gets some more
action and community vetting. But the tls plugin isn't a p
