Re: Mailling loop detection

2008-02-16 Thread Keith Ivey
Charlie Brady wrote: Suppose you have two addresses that forward to each other, either both on the local server or one remote and one local. qpsmtpd doesn't do forwarding between addresses, so doesn't need to address this issue. You may be right about purely local forwarding, but what about

Re: Mailling loop detection

2008-02-16 Thread a-rope . net-sub-qp
I've been using the following, though I don't recall how I obtained it. I checked my logs (28 days worth) and it hasn't rejected anything in that time. I haven't done any direct testing. == #!/usr/bin/perl =head1 NAME loops

Re: config wierdness

2008-02-16 Thread Matt Sergeant
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Chris Lewis wrote: Like Solaris usually does (grr), "hostname" returns the host node name (no dots), not the FQDN. config/me contains the FQDN, but $self->qp->config("me") _still_ returns the node name. I see the "sub config" code uses `hostname` as the default, but shou

Re: Mailling loop detection

2008-02-16 Thread Charlie Brady
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Keith Ivey wrote: Charlie Brady wrote: > Suppose you have two addresses that forward to each other, either both > on the local server or one remote and one local. qpsmtpd doesn't do forwarding between addresses, so doesn't need to address this issue. You may be rig

[PATCH] spamassassin needs a timeout

2008-02-16 Thread Robert Spier
Something changed somewhere at some point, unclear if it was on spamassassin's side or qpsmtpd's, or related to some wierd network issue, but we've started seeing something (possibly lost FIN packets, but that makes little sense) causing qpsmtpd to hang waiting for the spamassasin connection to fi