On 18-Dec-07, at 10:54 PM, Charlie Brady wrote:
mail from:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
rcpt to:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
250 mx1 Hi [4.3.2.1] [4.3.2.1]; I am so happy to meet you.
...
250 Queued!
220 220 mx ESMTP ;
Ah, OK - I see what your point is. The banner appears to have been
buffered, whereas the o
Hello,
I'm currently developing a plugin which tries to connect back to the
client in order to check if it is a real smtp server.
The problem I'm having with this is timeout handling. If I configure a
low timeout for my plugin (for the outgoing connection to the client),
everything works well.
H
On 21-Dec-07, at 3:52 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm currently developing a plugin which tries to connect back to the
client in order to check if it is a real smtp server.
Don't do that. There are good reasons why you might want to split
sending and receiving servers.
You could check the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm currently developing a plugin which tries to connect back to the
> client in order to check if it is a real smtp server.
While it's an interesting exercise, I hope you're planning _lots_ of
whitelisting. Large organizations (including us, including most of the
big
