On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 13:25 -0600, David Nicol wrote:
> This looks to me like, although he has PD'd the package, he intends to
> retain the restrictions on
> the qmail brand.
Nonsense. Read Stallman on public domain.
--
--gh
David Nicol skribis 2007-11-30 13:25 (-0600):
> This looks to me like, although he has PD'd the package, he intends to
> retain the restrictions on the qmail brand.
There appear to no longer be any restrictions. It may not be encouraged
to make changes, but it is certainly *allowed*.
> The "pleas
http://cr.yp.to/qmail/dist.html at this moment in time says:
QUOTE
I hereby place the qmail package (in particular, qmail-1.03.tar.gz,
with MD5 checksum 622f65f982e380dbe86e6574f3abcb7c) into the public
domain. You are free to modify the package, distribute modified
versions, etc.
This does not m
On Nov 30, 2007, at 12:03 PM, Guy Hulbert wrote:
Uh - the very first version of qpsmtpd was almost a line by line port
of qmail-smtpd.
That is interesting.
If it were PD, would you have tried to build an XS interface instead ?
Does that even make sense ?
What benefit do you imagine it'd
David Nicol wrote:
> This looks to me like, although he has PD'd the package, he intends to
> retain the restrictions on
> the qmail brand.
If he's made it PD, he cannot impose any restrictions. The "please"
recognizes that fact, and simply expresses a wish that people playing
with qmail don't b
Uh - the very first version of qpsmtpd was almost a line by line port
of qmail-smtpd.
- ask
--
http://develooper.com
On Nov 30, 2007, at 11:42, Guy Hulbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 13:18 -0500, Matt Sergeant wrote:
On 30-Nov-07, at 11:58 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
Guy Hulbert wrote:
Is the license change on qmail likely to change the direction of
qpsmtpd?
Doubtful. Qpsmtpd wasn't written because of a dislike of the license.
There have been proposals to extend Qpsmtpd to do more than qmail-smtpd
(indeed it already does). This license change makes it u
David Nicol wrote:
http://cr.yp.to/qmail/dist.html at this moment in time says:
QUOTE
I hereby place the qmail package (in particular, qmail-1.03.tar.gz,
with MD5 checksum 622f65f982e380dbe86e6574f3abcb7c) into the public
domain. You are free to modify the package, distribute modified
versions,
On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 13:18 -0500, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> On 30-Nov-07, at 11:58 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
> > Is the license change on qmail likely to change the direction of
> > qpsmtpd?
>
> Doubtful. Qpsmtpd wasn't written because of a dislike of the license.
There have been proposals to ex
Les Mikesell skribis 2007-11-30 10:58 (-0600):
> Is the license change on qmail likely to change the direction of
> qpsmtpd?
Hmm... qpsmtpd can now be distributed together with qmail. That'd be a
nice step towards a scriptable MTA.
--
Met vriendelijke groet, Kind regards, Korajn salutojn,
J
On 30-Nov-07, at 11:58 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
Is the license change on qmail likely to change the direction of
qpsmtpd?
Doubtful. Qpsmtpd wasn't written because of a dislike of the license.
An interesting move though.
Matt.
On Nov 30, 2007 7:46 PM, Chris Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Nicol wrote:
>
> > This looks to me like, although he has PD'd the package, he intends to
> > retain the restrictions on the qmail brand.
>
> If he's made it PD, he cannot impose any restrictions. The "please"
> recognizes tha
Is the license change on qmail likely to change the direction of
qpsmtpd? (Now you can fix it instead of replacing parts...).
http://cr.yp.to/qmail/dist.html
--
Les Mikesell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Nov 30, 2007, at 8:58 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
Is the license change on qmail likely to change the direction of
qpsmtpd? (Now you can fix it instead of replacing parts...).
This means that (net-)qmail can get bundled up as regular components /
options in the various distributions and w
On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 11:55 -0800, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
> Uh - the very first version of qpsmtpd was almost a line by line port
> of qmail-smtpd.
That is interesting.
If it were PD, would you have tried to build an XS interface instead ?
Does that even make sense ?
>
> - ask
--
--gh
15 matches
Mail list logo
