On 19-Oct-07, at 2:22 PM, Jose Luis Martinez wrote:
It looks like spammers are learning, and that they wait to pipe
all the message, adapting to earlytalker filters, making you have
to upper the wait on the helo. Is this intuition correct?
Yes. It's quite a recent change too - they updated
On Oct 19, 2007, at 8:34 AM, Charlie Brady wrote:
Anyway, will some or all of the patch be accepted and committed?
No, we'll bikeshed it to death first! :-)
Thanks for sticking through with it. See my other mail, we'll get
you setup so you can commit it yourself.
- ask
--
http://de
On Oct 19, 2007, at 11:22 AM, Jose Luis Martinez wrote:
I think this could be a good thing, because we would be making
spammers talk SMTP, without piping the message after waiting a
while. We have not seen this functionality in any plugin, so
CAPSiDE is contributing this tarpit module to
Hello,
I've been hanging around on this newsgroup for a couple of months, but
never contributed. I'm from a consulting company at Spain (CAPSiDE), and
we are studying on implementing qpsmtpd in a couple of projects.
Currently we are beta-testing it, and like it very much. Please note
that we
On Thu, 18 Oct 2007, David Nicol wrote:
FWIW, later on http://cr.yp.to/im/address.html Bernstein says
"Do not use an empty box part; it cannot appear in SMTP requests."
That's actually an open question, due to what appears to be a drafting
error in RFC2821. In 4.1.2 Command Argument Syntax,
