Re: 0.40 and whitelist_soft problem

2007-08-21 Thread JT Moree
Peter J. Holzer wrote: > Clearly this is useless and each plugin needs to decide what it wants to > do with the information that the message is whitelisted. > > (And since I haven't climbed that particular soap-box for some time I > want to point out that a global whitelist isn't generally useful

Re: 0.40 and whitelist_soft problem

2007-08-21 Thread JT Moree
JT Moree wrote: > So, I want spamassassin, dnsbl, and maybe rhsbl to skip processing if > they see the whitelist flags. The whitelist_soft plugin uses or in the case of using the regex_mailfrom plugin I'd have them do return DECLINED if $self->connection->notes('regex_mailfrom'); -- JT Moree

Re: 0.40 and whitelist_soft problem

2007-08-21 Thread m. allan noah
On 8/21/07, JT Moree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > JT Moree wrote: > > So, I want spamassassin, dnsbl, and maybe rhsbl to skip processing if > > they see the whitelist flags. The whitelist_soft plugin uses > > or in the case of using the regex_mailfrom plugin I'd have them do > > return DECLINED if

Re: 0.40 and whitelist_soft problem

2007-08-21 Thread Gavin Carr
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 08:56:00AM -0700, JT Moree wrote: > Peter J. Holzer wrote: > > Clearly this is useless and each plugin needs to decide what it wants to > > do with the information that the message is whitelisted. > > > > (And since I haven't climbed that particular soap-box for some time I

Re: [svn:qpsmtpd] r772 - trunk/lib/Qpsmtpd/SMTP

2007-08-21 Thread Robert Spier
This CL appears to remove the functionality of processing the hook's return value. Am I misreading it? -R At Sat, 18 Aug 2007 23:49:43 -0700 (PDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Author: vetinari > Date: Sat Aug 18 23:49:42 2007 > New Revision: 772 > > Modified: >trunk/lib/Qpsmtpd/SMTP/Pref