Re: sme server patch to allow relay to badrcptto

2009-11-24 Thread Robert Spier
Filippo Carletti wrote: > > > Off the top of my head which got two hours of sleep last night, it > > looks right.  Does it work? > > Yes, it works. > I think that's confirmation that it's right? Aren't plugin wrappers.. er.. inherited plugins cool? -R

Re: sme server patch to allow relay to badrcptto

2009-11-24 Thread Filippo Carletti
> Off the top of my head which got two hours of sleep last night, it > looks right.  Does it work? Yes, it works. -- Ciao, Filippo

Re: sme server patch to allow relay to badrcptto

2009-11-24 Thread Robert Spier
Filippo Carletti wrote: > > > As I suggested before, a plugin wrapper is the way to do these site > > specific customizations.  See "Inheritance" in docs/plugin.pod > > I did my homework. :-) > Would you please check if the attached plugin is what we need? Off the top of my head which got two

Re: sme server patch to allow relay to badrcptto

2009-11-24 Thread Filippo Carletti
> As I suggested before, a plugin wrapper is the way to do these site > specific customizations.  See "Inheritance" in docs/plugin.pod I did my homework. :-) Would you please check if the attached plugin is what we need? -- Ciao, Filippo check_badrcptto_relay Description: Binary data

Re: sme server patch to allow relay to badrcptto

2009-11-05 Thread Charlie Brady
On Thu, 5 Nov 2009, Shad L. Lords wrote: Robert Spier wrote: Charlie Brady wrote: > > On Wed, 4 Nov 2009, Filippo Carletti wrote: > > > In sme server we have some email aliases defined as visible=internal, > > that is internal users (relayclients) could write to them, but from > > out

Re: sme server patch to allow relay to badrcptto

2009-11-05 Thread Robert Spier
Shad L. Lords wrote: > > Robert Spier wrote: > > Charlie Brady wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, 4 Nov 2009, Filippo Carletti wrote: > >> > >>> In sme server we have some email aliases defined as visible=internal, > >>> that is internal users (relayclients) could write to them, but from > >>> outside the

Re: sme server patch to allow relay to badrcptto

2009-11-05 Thread Shad L. Lords
Robert Spier wrote: Charlie Brady wrote: On Wed, 4 Nov 2009, Filippo Carletti wrote: In sme server we have some email aliases defined as visible=internal, that is internal users (relayclients) could write to them, but from outside the lan (non relay clients) the email address is not reachab

Re: sme server patch to allow relay to badrcptto

2009-11-04 Thread Charlie Brady
On Wed, 4 Nov 2009, Filippo Carletti wrote: In sme server we have some email aliases defined as visible=internal, that is internal users (relayclients) could write to them, but from outside the lan (non relay clients) the email address is not reachable (non existent). I don't think this is th

Re: sme server patch to allow relay to badrcptto

2009-11-04 Thread Shad L. Lords
Filippo Carletti wrote: In sme server we have some email aliases defined as visible=internal, that is internal users (relayclients) could write to them, but from outside the lan (non relay clients) the email address is not reachable (non existent). (http://github.com/filippocarletti/qpsmtpd/blob

sme server patch to allow relay to badrcptto

2009-11-04 Thread Filippo Carletti
In sme server we have some email aliases defined as visible=internal, that is internal users (relayclients) could write to them, but from outside the lan (non relay clients) the email address is not reachable (non existent). (http://github.com/filippocarletti/qpsmtpd/blob/0c8c3fbd4a79d4ef3536ff90e