On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:19:27 +0200, Dale Gallagher wrote:
> 2008/6/27 Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> qpsmtpd-forkserver is our closest equivalent. I don't know if
>>> anyone's been running it under pperl or PersistentPerl for a while.
>>
>> Actually qpsmtpd-prefork is closer.
>
> Ok, gre
2008/6/27 Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> qpsmtpd-forkserver is our closest equivalent. I don't know if
>> anyone's been running it under pperl or PersistentPerl for a while.
>
> Actually qpsmtpd-prefork is closer.
Ok, great, thanks. Is qpsmtpd-async not faster? Which one would you
guys rec
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 04:17:55 -0700, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
>
>> Has anyone run qpsmtpd under PersistentPerl (a.k.a SpeedyCGI). There
>> is a mention of pperl, but I've never used it.
>
> qpsmtpd-forkserver is our closest equivalent. I don't know if
> anyone's been running it under pperl or Per
On Jun 27, 2008, at 3:43, Dale Gallagher wrote:
What exactly is the async version of qpsmtpd?
It's an event based version based on Danga::Socket (the same module
perlbal for example is built on).
Has anyone run qpsmtpd under PersistentPerl (a.k.a SpeedyCGI). There
is a mention of pperl,
Hi there
I'm about to try qpsmtpd (as a replacement for qmail-smtpd) and would
appreciate answers to some questions I have:
What exactly is the async version of qpsmtpd?
Has anyone run qpsmtpd under PersistentPerl (a.k.a SpeedyCGI). There
is a mention of pperl, but I've never used it.
I noticed
