Michael Holzt wrote:
BTW, is trunk working again, then?
Excuse my ignorance, but: What is trunk? I might have missed something.
The trunk (also called HEAD) is the main development line in the repository (in
this case CVS). Some projects have automatic scripts which build the trunk
files on eve
On 5 Sep 2004, at 15:08, Matt Sergeant wrote:
On 5 Sep 2004, at 13:52, John Peacock wrote:
Matt Sergeant wrote:
I think that may be my fault, by moving the global hooks hash into
the qpsmtpd object. But I think we definitely want to keep that
change, so we'll fix it if its broken instead of backi
On 5 Sep 2004, at 13:52, John Peacock wrote:
Matt Sergeant wrote:
I think that may be my fault, by moving the global hooks hash into
the qpsmtpd object. But I think we definitely want to keep that
change, so we'll fix it if its broken instead of backing it out.
Yeah, those are the changes I backe
> >BTW, is trunk working again, then?
Excuse my ignorance, but: What is trunk? I might have missed something.
-kju
--
It's an insane world, but i'm proud to be a part of it. -- Bill Hicks
Matt Sergeant wrote:
I think that may be my fault, by moving the global hooks hash into the
qpsmtpd object. But I think we definitely want to keep that change, so
we'll fix it if its broken instead of backing it out.
Yeah, those are the changes I backed out and it started working again. You are
Robert Spier wrote:
Fire! Fire!
Yeah, Friday was like that! Tweaking configurations for 200 desktops to work
with the new mail server, the president decides to work from home (and he lost
his WiFi card so he's using dialup, and he's never consciously deleted any
message from his Inbox), and th
On Sep 5, 2004, at 2:14 AM, Matt Sergeant wrote:
Clearly, the project policy is not that trunk is always [mostly]
functional (ouch). Once I finish up this stupid mail conversion (400
users and many gigabytes of mail), I'll try and spend a little time
writing more tests (and maybe a Makefile.PL
On 4 Sep 2004, at 12:49, John Peacock wrote:
BTW, is trunk working again, then? When I checked it out yesterday, I
discovered that some of the hooks were not running (like none of the
check* modules would fire). I had to back out the last set of
changes, since I had stupidly sync'd and smerged
> > (It loses the (To|Cc): qpsmtpd at perl.org, so it's really annoying to
> > reply to.)
> That's a carbon-based error (i.e. /I/ am deleting it). Since I am
> using a newsreader (and I'm not on the list), if I leave that header
> in, I get a warning message from the listserve software. I'll stop
Robert Spier wrote:
(It loses the (To|Cc): qpsmtpd at perl.org, so it's really annoying to
reply to.)
That's a carbon-based error (i.e. /I/ am deleting it). Since I am using a
newsreader (and I'm not on the list), if I leave that header in, I get a warning
message from the listserve software. I
> Robert Spier wrote:
> > (Side note, John, your newsreader is not doing nice things to the mail
> > headers.)
> (Sorry, Mozilla mail, you know. :o Care to be specific and I'll open
> a ticket with them?)
(It loses the (To|Cc): qpsmtpd at perl.org, so it's really annoying to
reply to.)
> > There
Robert Spier wrote:
(Side note, John, your newsreader is not doing nice things to the mail
headers.)
(Sorry, Mozilla mail, you know. :o Care to be specific and I'll open a ticket
with them?)
There's a namespace issue, because there are potentially multiple
results from multiple callbacks.
Oh, di
(Side note, John, your newsreader is not doing nice things to the mail
headers.)
> Funny, I thought that was what regexes were for... ;)
regwhat?
> > - We teach plugins to record things.. so spamassassin could do
> > something like $qp->transaction->notes( 'stats_spam' => 1 ); or
> >
> We already have 'queue' and 'deny' hooks - we can just plug in to that.
> I've been using the attached plugin to do stats capturing to a dbm
> database - I'd probably change the backend now (given some weirdness I've
> been seeing with Berkeley DB under load), but the general concept has
> work
> A bit like this?
> http://stats.logidac.com/qpsmtpd.shtml
That's quite pretty!
Robert Spier wrote:
It would be cool to integrate mailgraph (or something like it) into
qpsmtpd.
http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/2004/08/12/mailgraph.html
A bit like this?
http://stats.logidac.com/qpsmtpd.shtml
If so, here's a quick explanation on how it works:
http://stats.logidac.com/how/
I ju
Robert Spier wrote:
I don't really like the idea of parsing qpsmtpd's log files, because
in high debug modes (like we run) there's a ton of "garbage" in
there.
Funny, I thought that was what regexes were for... ;)
- We teach plugins to record things.. so spamassassin could do
something
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 08:13:26AM -0700, Robert Spier wrote:
> > > It would be cool to integrate mailgraph (or something like it) into
> > > qpsmtpd.
> > > http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/2004/08/12/mailgraph.html
> >
> > Interesting! My boss just last week suggested we need to do some
> > in
> > It would be cool to integrate mailgraph (or something like it) into
> > qpsmtpd.
> > http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/2004/08/12/mailgraph.html
>
> Interesting! My boss just last week suggested we need to do some
> internal promoting and maintain some uptime graphs of the various
> systems.
Robert Spier wrote:
It would be cool to integrate mailgraph (or something like it) into
qpsmtpd.
http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/2004/08/12/mailgraph.html
Interesting! My boss just last week suggested we need to do some internal
promoting and maintain some uptime graphs of the various systems.
It would be cool to integrate mailgraph (or something like it) into
qpsmtpd.
http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/2004/08/12/mailgraph.html
21 matches
Mail list logo
