On 07/29/2009 09:39 PM, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
On Jul 29, 2009, at 12:07, Jared Johnson wrote:
We recently noticed a message in our postfix queue that thought it
was addressed to " foo.com". After examining it, it turned out that
Qpsmtpd accepted a MAIL FROM command formatted like so:
MAIL
On 07/30/2009 07:11 AM, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
On 2009-07-29 14:07:53 -0500, Jared Johnson wrote:
We recently noticed a message in our postfix queue that thought it was
addressed to " foo.com". After examining it, it turned out that Qpsmtpd
accepted a MAIL FROM command formatted like so:
MAIL
On 2009-07-29 14:07:53 -0500, Jared Johnson wrote:
> We recently noticed a message in our postfix queue that thought it was
> addressed to " foo.com". After examining it, it turned out that Qpsmtpd
> accepted a MAIL FROM command formatted like so:
>
> MAIL FROM:
Weird.
Ah, I see the problem
On Jul 29, 2009, at 12:07, Jared Johnson wrote:
We recently noticed a message in our postfix queue that thought it
was addressed to " foo.com". After examining it, it turned out that
Qpsmtpd accepted a MAIL FROM command formatted like so:
MAIL FROM:
Weird tha postfix would munge it. I
Lewis, Chris (CAR:W669) wrote:
Here's a useful meta-reference:
http://www.rfc-ignorant.org/rfcs/rfc2821.php#page72 an search for
"source route".
I didn't mention: there is now no good reason whatsoever to accept
source routes - they date back to the arpanet. It's been deprecated
since RFC
Jared Johnson wrote:
We recently noticed a message in our postfix queue that thought it was
addressed to " foo.com". After examining it, it turned out that Qpsmtpd
accepted a MAIL FROM command formatted like so:
MAIL FROM:
When it passed it to postfix, it transmographied it first into the
s
We recently noticed a message in our postfix queue that thought it was
addressed to " foo.com". After examining it, it turned out that Qpsmtpd
accepted a MAIL FROM command formatted like so:
MAIL FROM:
When it passed it to postfix, it transmographied it first into the
sender 'u...@domain.com
