I applied this to my tree, but then reverted it.
It may be possible for the _body_file fh to be closed, but _filename
still be set.
Do we still want to fail in that case?
-R
Steve Kemp wrote:
>
> The current code in body_filename doesn't test that
> the flush operation succeeds leading
The current code in body_filename doesn't test that
the flush operation succeeds leading to potential
message loss.
All current plugins distributed in the core test
to see if body_filename() returns a defined value
so we can fix this with the following patch:
--
s...@gold:~/git/qpsmtpd$ g
